On the Origins of Gender Roles: Women and the Plough

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. ABSTRACT On the Origins of Gender Roles: Women and the Plough *This paper seeks to better understand the historical origins of current differences in norms and beliefs about the appropriate role of women in society. We test the hypothesis that traditional agricultural practices influenced the historical gender division of labor and the evolution and persistence of gender norms. We find that, consistent with existing hypotheses, the descendants of societies that traditionally practiced plough agriculture, today have lower rates of female participation in the workplace, in politics, and in entrepreneurial activities, as well as a greater prevalence of attitudes favoring gender inequality. We identify the causal impact of traditional plough use by exploiting variation in the historical geo-climatic suitability of the environment for growing crops that differentially benefited from the adoption of the plough. Our IV estimates, based on this variation, support the findings from OLS. To isolate the importance of cultural transmission as a mechanism, we examine female labor force participation of second-generation immigrants living within the US. JEL Classification:D03, J16, N30

The Agricultural Origins of Time Preference

“…In particular, as established in Tables B.16, B.18, B.19 and B.20, accounting for the structure of languages (Chen, 2013), the availability of the plough (Alesina et al, 2013), income inequality, the population’s age structure, life-expectancy, and religious composition, does not alter the results. Moreover, the the analysis is robust to the correction of standard errors for spatial autocorrelation (Tables B.13 and B.14).…”

“…Moreover, it sheds additional light on the geographical and bio-cultural origins of comparative development (e.g., Ashraf and Galor, 2013; Diamond, 1997), the interaction between the evolution of human traits and the process of development (Galor and Moav, 2002; Spolaore and Wacziarg, 2013), and the persistence of cultural characteristics (e.g., Alesina et al, 2013; Belloc and Bowles, 2013; Bisin and Verdier, 2000; Fernández, 2012; Nunn and Wantchekon, 2011). …”

What Are the Best Predictors of Opinions of Mental Illness in the Indian Population?

“…There is evidence that cultural differences impact gender roles [67], perceived parental nurturing [62], ideas of aging [68], and political affiliation [69]. Although the model could be used to predict OMI scores in other cultural settings, the relation between the predictors and the criterion is quite likely to differ across cultures, thereby limiting the utility of the current regression model.…”

Does Crop Determine Culture?

“…Alesina, Giuliano, and Nunn go several steps further. 22 While there is an ongoing debate about how sharp the gender division of labor was in the American cotton sector, there is no question that women contributed significantly to production of this cash crop. In our work studying antebellum plantations, Olmstead and I have found that women and children picked a majority of the cotton crop.…”