2012
DOI: 10.1039/c2ce06654h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the origin of the electroactive poly(vinylidene fluoride) β-phase nucleation by ferrite nanoparticles via surface electrostatic interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
166
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 249 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
7
166
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result demonstrates that the presence of nanocrystallites of KNN in PVDF promotes strong electrostatic interaction between KNN at nanoscale and the PVDF polymer especially at the interface, leading to the alignment of the PVDF matrix in the extended TTTT conformation and resulting in the β-phase. Similar behavior is observed in the PVDF with various fillers such as BaTiO 3 , MWCNT, TiO 2 , and ferrite-based composites [41,[52][53][54][55]. It is known in the literature that high pressure favors β-phase formation of PVDF [10].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…This result demonstrates that the presence of nanocrystallites of KNN in PVDF promotes strong electrostatic interaction between KNN at nanoscale and the PVDF polymer especially at the interface, leading to the alignment of the PVDF matrix in the extended TTTT conformation and resulting in the β-phase. Similar behavior is observed in the PVDF with various fillers such as BaTiO 3 , MWCNT, TiO 2 , and ferrite-based composites [41,[52][53][54][55]. It is known in the literature that high pressure favors β-phase formation of PVDF [10].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…CFO nanoparticle content has no significant impact on the nanofibre average diameter [ Figure 1 (a-d)]. The CFO/PVDF nanofibres show a strong enhancement in the volume fraction of electroactive β phase F β [11,12] when compared to pure PVDF electrospun nanofibers [ Figure 1(e) and (f)], as the interaction between the negatively charged surface of the CFO nanoparticles (whose zeta potential is -22 mV) and the positively charged polymer CH 2 groups promotes nucleation of the polar β phase, as seen in CFO/PVDF films [10]. The increase in β phase volume fraction is also assisted by the low evaporation temperature of the solvent (≤ 60 o C) and the stretching that occurs during jet formation [13].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is to notice that those β-phase contents are compatible with the maximum piezoelectric response of the polymer, as it has been verified in 33 . In this way, the β-phase formation is mainly attributed to the low solvent evaporation temperature (≤ 60 o C), which mainly leads to the crystallization of the polymer in this phase 15,34 . Further, electrostatic interaction of the filler nanoparticles with the highly polar polymer chains certainly reinforce this effect, as it has been verified in samples prepared after melting, that are nucleated in the β-phase, whereas the polymer without fillers remain in the α-phase 15 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2) as a function of filler content. The presence of the CFO nanoparticles improves the piezoelectric response of composite spheres due to the electrostatic interactions between particles and polymer 31,34 . Once a 220 mT DC magnetic field was applied with two permanent magnets, at the same time that the piezoelectric response is being measured, an increase in the |d 33 | value is observed in the composite samples but no variation is detected in the pristine polymer samples revealing the ME character of the multiferroic spheres (Figure 2b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%