2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00339-015-9582-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the origin of contact resistances in graphene devices fabricated by optical lithography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The change of device resistance between measurements is related to a change in the doping level due to the absorption or desorption of adsorbates on the graphene, as the devices were not encapsulated and measurements were performed under ambient conditions. The measured device resistance of 127 Ω to 240 Ω for a 50 µm wide and 1.8 µm long two terminal device can be explained well by a sheet resistance of order 1 kΩ and a contact resistance of the order of several kΩµm, which is are typical values for graphene devices fabricated using optical lithography [25].The low frequency response of the photodetectors was measured with a lock-in amplifier at 1 kHz and a modulated laser source at 1550 nm. A photo current was only present in the case of an external bias voltage showing a negative sign with respect to the DC current.…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The change of device resistance between measurements is related to a change in the doping level due to the absorption or desorption of adsorbates on the graphene, as the devices were not encapsulated and measurements were performed under ambient conditions. The measured device resistance of 127 Ω to 240 Ω for a 50 µm wide and 1.8 µm long two terminal device can be explained well by a sheet resistance of order 1 kΩ and a contact resistance of the order of several kΩµm, which is are typical values for graphene devices fabricated using optical lithography [25].The low frequency response of the photodetectors was measured with a lock-in amplifier at 1 kHz and a modulated laser source at 1550 nm. A photo current was only present in the case of an external bias voltage showing a negative sign with respect to the DC current.…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…We find a contact resistance of 4400 Ωμm, which corresponds to the reported minimum for optical lithography. 47 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative threshold voltage and the high subthreshold swing indicate that a further reduction of debris is essential for high performance TFTs with laser patterned graphene electrodes. Once this is achieved the laser process is favorable compared to conventional patterning by UV lithography avoiding doping of the graphene electrodes due to resist residues [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The handling and processing of graphene, however, still represents a great challenge, since several processing steps induce an unwanted modification of the material properties. For example, the use of photoresists or polymer films on graphene for photolithography and/or transfer processes cause chemical doping of the layer [9][10][11][12][13] or patterning with e-beam lithography hydrogenates the graphene basal plane causing defects [14]. The necessary post-processing cleaning step in Ar/H 2 at 250 − 400 • C for removing polymer residues can also lead to graphene degradation [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%