2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the optimal design and robustness of spatially distributed tuned mass dampers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the proposed ATID-P, the stiffness ratio  can be effectively adjusted by changing the proportional feedback gain 0 g according to Eq. (7). For example, a large value of  can be obtained when 0 g falls in the range (  1, 0 − where  increases as 0 g approaches -1.…”
Section: Parameters Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the proposed ATID-P, the stiffness ratio  can be effectively adjusted by changing the proportional feedback gain 0 g according to Eq. (7). For example, a large value of  can be obtained when 0 g falls in the range (  1, 0 − where  increases as 0 g approaches -1.…”
Section: Parameters Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In this regard, proper damping techniques need to be considered in parallel with the future design of lightweight structures. Vibration absorbers, especially tuned mass dampers (TMDs) are often used for such purpose [3][4][5][6][7]. A TMD typically consists of a proof mass and a spring-dashpot pair added to the primary structure as an auxiliary system [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency ratio of these two branch resonance points can be obtained as (the detailed derivation is shown in Appendix B) {β2normalMgoodbreak=2+2μ22γ2+()γ2goodbreak+2μ22goodbreak−22+8μ22α24β2normalNgoodbreak=2+2μ22γ2()γ2goodbreak+2μ22goodbreak−22+8μ22α24 where subscript M and N represents the first and second branch resonance point, respectively. Many literatures have pointed out that if η 2M = η 2N , better performance of the TMD system will occur, so the maximum value of the dynamic coefficient η 2max = η 2M = η 2N can be deduced as 10,14,25,26 η2maxgoodbreak=2γ22+23γ2α2 …”
Section: Analytical Model Of a Wtt With Ps‐tmdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since how to design the TMD system with optimal parameters has been reported in many studies, 23,25–27 this section only tunes parameters of the PS‐TMD system, including optimal pre‐stress and damping ratio. And then design procedure of the proposed PS‐TMD system for the WTT is given.…”
Section: Design Procedures For the Ps‐tmd Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying vibration absorbers is an effective means of vibration mitigation. Traditional vibration absorbers, namely tuned mass dampers or linear vibration absorbers (LVAs), are widely used in the vibration mitigation of various systems, like multistory buildings [1], rectangular plates [2], and airfoil models [3]. The LVA is a simple mass-damping-spring structure, but it can only mitigate vibration in a narrow frequency band and may generate new resonance peaks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%