On the Opportunity Cost of Crop Diversification

Abstract

Distance functions are increasingly being augmented, with environmental goods treated as conventional outputs. A common approach to evaluate the opportunity cost of providing an environmental good is the exploitation of the distance function's dual relationship to the value function. This implies that the opportunity cost is assumed to be non-negative. This approach also requires a convex technology set. Focusing on crop diversification for a balanced sample of 44 cereal farms in the East of England for the years 2007-2013, this paper develops a novel opportunity cost measure that does not depend on these strong assumptions. We find that the opportunity cost of crop diversification is negative for most farms.

Investment profitability and economic efficiency of the drip irrigation system: Evidence from Egypt*

“…The results of the DEA model are shown in Table VIII, which includes summary statistics for the technical, cost, scale and allocative efficiency scores. The TE scores are given under both CRS and VRS (Ang et al, 2018). The average TE score under VRS was 0.98, ranging from 0.64 to 1.00 across the sample surveyed.…”

“…Cost efficiency and allocative efficiency. The allocative and cost efficiencies can be obtained by solving the following additional cost minimization DEA problem (Picazo‐Tadeo et al, 2012; Ang et al, 2018): subject to …”

Measuring Sustainable Intensification Using Satellite Remote Sensing Data

“…Accounting for positive externalities in the efficiency analysis was applied later by [22]. This earlier work led to the development of sustainable production and SI metrics that incorporate environmental aspects (positive and/or negative externalities) into efficiency analysis, either using stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) or data envelopment analysis (DEA) [12,[23][24][25]. The first to derive an SI indicator from efficiency analysis using DEA was [24].…”

Barriers and Levers to Developing Wheat–Pea Intercropping in Europe: A Review

“…Thus, this intercropping meets not only the need to reduce chemical inputs (fertilizers and phytosanitary products) and their associated production costs but also the need to secure yields to address interannual variability [23][24][25]. The better quality of wheat produced in intercropping with pea can also have economic benefits for farmers by increasing the protein rate.…”