1958
DOI: 10.1080/00268975800100261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the nuclear magnetic shielding in the hydrogen molecule

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
100
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 241 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
100
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 1 H-and 13 C-chemical shifts were calculated with the B3LYP/6-311G HF/6-311G optimized geometries by GIAO method [19]. In order to obtain the calculated results comparable with the experimental data, we have transformed the absolute shieldings returned by the program in chemical shifts subtracting to the absolute shielding of TMS and the absolute shieldings of the molecule in exam.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 1 H-and 13 C-chemical shifts were calculated with the B3LYP/6-311G HF/6-311G optimized geometries by GIAO method [19]. In order to obtain the calculated results comparable with the experimental data, we have transformed the absolute shieldings returned by the program in chemical shifts subtracting to the absolute shielding of TMS and the absolute shieldings of the molecule in exam.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the structures were fully optimized with the Gaussian 03 program [18]. After the optimization, 1 H-and 13 C-chemical shifts were calculated with GIAO method [19,20], using corresponding TMS shielding calculated at the same theoretical levels as the reference. All the computations were done using an IBM x225 Xeon computer that has 2048 MB ram.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the DFT calculations we employed the BP86(VWN) functional [16][17][18] with the SG-1 grid [19] for the numerical integrations [20]. NMR calculations were performed using the 6-31G * * [21,22] basis with our linear-scaling method [7,8] at the GIAO-HF [23][24][25][26][27] and GIAO-DFT [28][29][30][31][32][33][34] levels, respectively. Relative NMR shifts are given, unless noted otherwise, with respect to those of a TMS molecule calculated at the same level of theory.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For CO 2 , CS 2 and CSe 2 , we compare our results with previous nonrelativistic ab initio [17] data and with experiment [29][30][31][32][33][34]. The atomic-orbital-driven (AO-driven) scheme recently introduced by Bast et al [35] for calculating time-dependent molecular properties with one-, two-and four-component relativistic methods is extended to first-order frequency-dependent magnetic perturbations with London atomic orbitals (LAOs) [36][37][38][39][40], thereby ensuring gaugeorigin independence of the calculated results. The present work can also be considered an extension of our recent analytic implementation of Buckingham birefringence [22] to Kohn-Sham (KS) density-functional theory (DFT).…”
mentioning
confidence: 58%