2010
DOI: 10.1080/00268970903476647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum-chemical simulation of solid-state NMR spectra: the example of a molecular tweezer host–guest complex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These types of equilibria are not ruled out in the more stable cases either, although they appear to be most unlikely due to the large Δδ max values and the better correspondence between computed and experimental data. The situation here is thus rather different from the previously studied molecular tweezers, , where the guest molecules were more rigid and did not have the same conformational freedom as the flexible lysine or arginine side chains. Thus, dynamical equilibria play a more important role for the present systems.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These types of equilibria are not ruled out in the more stable cases either, although they appear to be most unlikely due to the large Δδ max values and the better correspondence between computed and experimental data. The situation here is thus rather different from the previously studied molecular tweezers, , where the guest molecules were more rigid and did not have the same conformational freedom as the flexible lysine or arginine side chains. Thus, dynamical equilibria play a more important role for the present systems.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…The full NMR shielding tensors were calculated for all nuclei within both molecular entities with the HF method using the SVP basis set, employing a local development version of the Q-Chem quantum chemical software package to yield the complexation-induced chemical shifts Δδ max . The reliability of the HF/SVP approach utilizing gauge including atomic orbitals (GIAO) has been shown elsewhere for comparable systems. , For the calculation of the nuclear shieldings, we apply linear-scaling methods, , together with the recently developed density matrix-based Laplace reformulation of coupled self-consistent field equations (DL-CPSCF) , In cases where the flexibility of two or more close-by rotating hydrogens yields only one peak in the experimental NMR spectrum, the calculated results were averaged accordingly over these hydrogen shifts. For diastereotopic hydrogens in host–guest species 1b ·Ac Lys OMe and 1b ·Ts Arg OMe labeled with footnote “d” in Table , the computed hydrogen shifts are assigned in two different possible ways and the values closer to the experimental ones are chosen to represent the calculated diastereotopic NMR shifts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there has been renewed interest in modernized versions of these sorts of methods. Thanks to increased computer power and efficient algorithms for chemical shift calculations within the gauge-including atomic orbital (GIAO) formalism, chemical shift prediction on larger clusters of molecules can now be performed routinely. Clusters consisting of ∼10–15 molecules within a few angstroms of a molecule in the asymmetric unit mimic the effect of the extended molecular crystal lattice on the chemical shielding of the central molecule very effectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These recent successes emphasize how the highly local nature of the chemical shielding tensor makes it amenable to machine-learning based on local geometric descriptors that capture the chemical environment within several Ångstroms from the atom of interest. At the same time, ample evidence demonstrates that chemical shieldings can be influenced by surrounding atoms lying 5–8 Å away, outside the range of local atomic environment descriptors typically used in present-day ML models. Despite the excellent progress in ML chemical shielding prediction discussed above, the errors in current state-of-the-art ML models relative to first-principles DFT remain substantially larger than the errors between DFT and experiment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%