2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2028933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Non-Exclusivity of Loan Contracts: An Empirical Investigation

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also believe that investigating the conditions under which a rm obtains a loan from another bank (and not from an existing lender that remains operational or closes its branch) is the most pertinent question -and it is the one addressed in von Thadden (2004). It is correct that moving versus adding a relationship may be a meaningful distinction for de novo rms (Farinha and Santos (2002)) or for rms that switch following bank mergers (Degryse et al (2011)). As we analyze only Moreover, we do not retain rms that cease their relationship with the inside bank (i.e., rms that do not have any business dealings with this bank for more than 12 months), because this question is not relevant in the context of the model presented by von Thadden (2004) Average (median) bank debt for switching rms is ¿532,032 (¿68,424), less than ¿579,224 (¿35,661) observed for nonswitching loans.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also believe that investigating the conditions under which a rm obtains a loan from another bank (and not from an existing lender that remains operational or closes its branch) is the most pertinent question -and it is the one addressed in von Thadden (2004). It is correct that moving versus adding a relationship may be a meaningful distinction for de novo rms (Farinha and Santos (2002)) or for rms that switch following bank mergers (Degryse et al (2011)). As we analyze only Moreover, we do not retain rms that cease their relationship with the inside bank (i.e., rms that do not have any business dealings with this bank for more than 12 months), because this question is not relevant in the context of the model presented by von Thadden (2004) Average (median) bank debt for switching rms is ¿532,032 (¿68,424), less than ¿579,224 (¿35,661) observed for nonswitching loans.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regressions, instead, use variation across all observations and control for the average effect of any control variable on the dependent variable in a linear fashion. 34 We match using a procedure similar to Ioannidou and Ongena (2010) and Degryse, Ioannidou and von Schedvin (2016), matching on each variable individually allowing for replacement and multiple neighbors. For discrete variables, we use exact matching.…”
Section: Robustness Checksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this data set Degryse, Ioannidou, and Von Schedvin () investigate the nonexclusivity of Swedish loan contracts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%