1978
DOI: 10.1007/bf01021837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the nature of the dynamic magnetic fields acting on fast moving ions in magnetic materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure3Precession angles !i()!g as a function of the number of polarized electrons per cm2 encountered by 82Se ions traversing iron and gadolinium foils. The linearity with respect to the foil thickness indicates that the transient field is approximately proportional to the velocity of the ion, while the fact that the same curves fit both the data for iron and gadolinium foils reflects the direct proportionality of the transient field to the magnetization of the foil(Brennan et al 1978a). Annu.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Figure3Precession angles !i()!g as a function of the number of polarized electrons per cm2 encountered by 82Se ions traversing iron and gadolinium foils. The linearity with respect to the foil thickness indicates that the transient field is approximately proportional to the velocity of the ion, while the fact that the same curves fit both the data for iron and gadolinium foils reflects the direct proportionality of the transient field to the magnetization of the foil(Brennan et al 1978a). Annu.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…It is important to carry out precession measurements at well defined ion velocities in order to determine the electron configurations and the intricate mechanisms involved in TF. These conditions, in which the ions barely slow down (velocity-differential), are achieved either by choosing a very short lived nuclear state [22] or using thin ferromagnetic foils [19]. In both cases, the nuclear lifetime or the transit time of the ions through the foil has to be small compared to the slowing down time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Absolute g(2 + 1 ) values were determined from their relative g-factor measurements by adopting g(2 + 1 ; 82 Se) = +0.496 (29) as the reference. This absolute g factor was deduced from a previous measurement of 82 Se 2 + 1 -state precession angles in iron and gadolinium hosts [32]. As the precession angles from Ref.…”
Section: B Transient-field G-factor Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…As the precession angles from Ref. [32] were measured to study the TF, not to determine a g factor, it appears that the adopted g factor was obtained by re-analyzing those data using the Rutgers TF parametrization to calibrate the field strength. As such, this calibration g factor is not an independently determined quantity, and the accuracy of the magnitude of the reported g factors due to the normalizing g factor remains in question.…”
Section: B Transient-field G-factor Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%