On the Logical Computational Complexity Analysis of Turbo Decoding Algorithms for the LTE Standards

Beeharry, Yogesh; Fowdur, Tulsi Pawan; Soyjaudah, K. M. S.

doi:10.1007/s11277-021-08106-x

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A channel encoder systematically adds redundant data and transforms bit sequences of information into encoded bit sequences. A channel decoder can correct a received signal's redundant bits that have been distorted by the receiver's noisy channel [3], [4]. This channel coding technique is called forward error correction (FEC).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effects of the cross-entropy stopping criterion and quadrature amplitude modulation on iterative turbo decoding performance

Mohamad

Nasir

Anas³

2021

IJEECS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

One of the most often-used stopping criteria is the cross-entropy stopping criterion (CESC). The CESC can stop turbo decoder iterations early by calculating mutual information improvements while maintaining bit error rate (BER) performance. Most research on iterative turbo decoding stopping criteria has utilised low-modulation methods, such as binary phase-shift keying. However, a high-speed network requires high modulation to transfer data at high speeds. Hence, a high modulation technique needs to be integrated into the CESC to match its speed. Therefore, the present paper investigated and analysed the effects of the CESC and quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) on iterative turbo decoding. Three thresholds were simulated and tested under four situations: different code rates, different QAM formats, different code generators, and different frame sizes. The results revealed that in most situations, the use of CESC is suitable only when the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is high. This is because the CESC significantly reduces the average iteration number (AIN) while maintaining the BER. The CESC can terminate early at a high SNR and save more than 40% AIN compared with the fixed stopping criterion. Meanwhile, at a low SNR, the CESC fails to terminate early, which results in maximum AIN.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%