On the likelihood of using Mobility-as-a-Service: A case study on innovative mobility services among residents in the Netherlands

Abstract

This research study aims at providing new insights regarding attitudes among residents towards the introduction of Mobility-asa-Service (MaaS). We were especially interested in finding out how likely residents would be willing to use MaaS when introduced in their place of residence. The study involved a quantitative survey and focus group interviews with residents in the Paleiskwartier district, in the city of 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands. Our results show that positive attitudes towards MaaS are the most important factors for the intention to use MaaS, whereas socio-economic characteristics seem not to play a role. Moreover, our results also indicate that most residents are more likely to not use MaaS in the long run, but a considerable amount of them would be interested in trying it out, at least. Equally important, the introduction of MaaS pilots may experience a greater receptivity among residents who do not see car ownership and usage as very important aspects, who regularly use public transport and who are mostly concerned with the environment and with a healthy commuting lifestyle. Conversely, people who use the car on a daily basis and regard car ownership as a very important aspect are far less receptive to MaaS pilots. Therefore, the sole idea of MaaS as an environmentally friendly alternative to make car ownership superfluous may potentially be inefficient against avid car users.

An Ecosystem Innovation Framework: Assessing Mobility as a Service in Budapest

“…For example, the STIB + Cambio Scheme in Brussels extends public transport with car-sharing services. This service attribute of MaaS, i.e., the extension of Public Transport services, was appreciated in the case study amongst residents in the Netherlands [37]. Qixxit, in Germany, is an example of extending a flight booking service.…”

How Mobility as a Service Impacts Public Transport Business Models

“…The research evidence is mixed. With MaaS not being in place, stated preference studies (Caiati, Rasouli and Timmermans, 2020;Fioreze, De Gruijter and Geurs, 2019;Guidon et al, 2020;Ho, Mulley and Hensher, 2020;Matyas and Kamargianni, 2018) have posed hypothetical options to respondents and have concentrated more on what travellers would like to see in their mobility bundles rather than whether they would prefer PAYG to a prepay option with a discount offered. Nevertheless, there seems to be some context-specific outcomes.…”

Artificial Intelligence, Transport and the Smart City: Definitions and Dimensions of a New Mobility Era

“…The total body of this literature has been exclusively published from 2011 onwards, with more papers being issued every year. These studies cover many MaaS angles, including user experience [52][53][54], attitudes [55,56], integration with public transport [57][58][59], business models [60,61], travel behaviour [62,63], governance and policy [64,65], urban futures [66,67] and even Blockchain adaption [68].…”