2021
DOI: 10.3390/su13073753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Ecosystem Innovation Framework: Assessing Mobility as a Service in Budapest

Abstract: Smart Mobility and the introduction of innovation in the complex and dynamic actor ecosystem of urban transport is faced with the need to manage change in order to secure sustainability and protect against negative externalities. The present contribution provides decision-makers with a tool to assess innovation strategies and monitor change over time. The proposed EcoSystem Innovation Framework (ESIF) is applied to a flagship innovation: Mobility as a Service (MaaS). The application concerns the City of Budape… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from the urban area, the suburban and rural areas have a great potential in adopting MaaS (Barreto et al, 2018a; Eckhardt et al, 2018; Hasselwander et al, 2022; Jittrapirom et al, 2020; Qiao and Yeh, 2021) for better access to public transit. Third, in the real-world practice and stakeholder’s opinion, a city with a highly developed public transit system is more likely to have the modal shift to MaaS (Roumboutsos et al, 2021). In Sweden, which is the early adopter of this concept, MaaS was discussed as a tool for enhancing the attractiveness of public transit to meet growth goals for sustainable transport modes (Smith et al, 2018b).…”
Section: Overview Of the Infrastructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the urban area, the suburban and rural areas have a great potential in adopting MaaS (Barreto et al, 2018a; Eckhardt et al, 2018; Hasselwander et al, 2022; Jittrapirom et al, 2020; Qiao and Yeh, 2021) for better access to public transit. Third, in the real-world practice and stakeholder’s opinion, a city with a highly developed public transit system is more likely to have the modal shift to MaaS (Roumboutsos et al, 2021). In Sweden, which is the early adopter of this concept, MaaS was discussed as a tool for enhancing the attractiveness of public transit to meet growth goals for sustainable transport modes (Smith et al, 2018b).…”
Section: Overview Of the Infrastructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latter, a MaaS coordinator undertakes the role of coordinating MaaS among the various actors that participate in the MaaS scheme. The key difference between the two MaaS governance models is the risk bearing, as in the coordinator model, the risk is distributed among the different MaaS actors (Roumboutsos et al, 2021).…”
Section: Maas Governance Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[27] proposed an interoperated, intelligent, and integrated platform for smart city ecosystem. [28] proposed strategies for extended product business models in manufacturing service ecosystems. Smart, [29] applied the ecosystem service concept to air quality management.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%