1999
DOI: 10.1109/42.796283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Laplace-Beltrami operator and brain surface flattening

Abstract: In this paper, using certain conformal mappings from uniformization theory, we give an explicit method for flattening the brain surface in a way which preserves angles. From a triangulated surface representation of the cortex, we indicate how the procedure may be implemented using finite elements. Further, we show how the geometry of the brain surface may be studied using this approach.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
164
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
164
0
Order By: Relevance
“…developing parameterizations that are conformal (Angenent et al, 1999;Haker et al, 2000;Hurdal and Stephenson 2004, this volume); in these, the grid lines on the surface intersect at right angles (see grid in Fig. 2, panel 7a), and angular relationships are preserved as data are mapped from one surface to another.…”
Section: Cortical Surface Extraction and Parameterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…developing parameterizations that are conformal (Angenent et al, 1999;Haker et al, 2000;Hurdal and Stephenson 2004, this volume); in these, the grid lines on the surface intersect at right angles (see grid in Fig. 2, panel 7a), and angular relationships are preserved as data are mapped from one surface to another.…”
Section: Cortical Surface Extraction and Parameterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The central surface, in particular, demonstrates accuracy and repeatability in the range of 0.5 and 0.25 mm, respectively. We believe that the central surface is useful for characterization and analysis of the 2-D geometry of the cortex-for example, computation of curvatures (Cachia et al, 2003a;Zeng et al, 1999), geodesic distances (Cachia et al, 2003b;Rettmann et al, 2002), segmenting sulci or gyri (Behnke et al, 2003;Cachia et al, 2003b;Rettmann et al, 2002), surface flattening (Carman et al, 1995;Drury et al, 1996), and spherical mapping (Angenent et al, 1999;Fischl et al, 1999a;Tosun and Prince, 2001).…”
Section: Qualitative Demonstrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For quantitative evaluation, however, it is necessary to establish a coordinate system on the cortex so that features can be identified more rigorously (Angenent et al, 1999;Drury et al, 1996;Fischl et al, 1999;Hurdal et al, 1999;MacDonald et al, 2000;Thompson et al, 2000). Spherical coordinates are appropriate since the topology of the sphere is the same as that of the cortical surface.…”
Section: Spherical Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spherical coordinates are appropriate since the topology of the sphere is the same as that of the cortical surface. Two general approaches have been explored in the past: (1) iterative relaxation followed by radial projection to the sphere (Fischl et al, 1999;Sereno et al, 1996) and (2) conformal mapping (Angenent et al, 1999).…”
Section: Spherical Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation