1963
DOI: 10.1002/j.2333-8504.1963.tb00116.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Johnson‐neyman Technique and Some Extensions Thereof

Abstract: The Johnson-NeJ~~n technique is a statistical tool used most frequently in educational and psychological applications. This paper starts by briefly reviewing the Johnson-Neyman technique and suggesting when it should and should not be used; then several different modifications and extensions of the Johnson-Neyman technique, all of them conceptually simple are proposed. The close relation between confidence intervals and regions of significance of the .Johnson-Neyman t~'lle is pointed out. The problem of what t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 There is a distinction between simultaneous and nonsimultaneous confidence bands and regions of significance (Pothoff, 1964). For nonsimultaneous bands, rejection rates are accurate for any given conditional value of the moderator.…”
Section: Moderationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 There is a distinction between simultaneous and nonsimultaneous confidence bands and regions of significance (Pothoff, 1964). For nonsimultaneous bands, rejection rates are accurate for any given conditional value of the moderator.…”
Section: Moderationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only nonsimultaneous confidence bands and regions of significance are discussed here, as we consider them more practically relevant. For more information on the distinction between simultaneous and nonsimultaneous bands, consult Pothoff (1964) and Rogosa (1981).…”
Section: Moderationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By probe, we mean the calculation of point estimates along with standard errors and confidence intervals that provide inferential tests of the relation between the repeated measures and time conditioned on one or more exogenous predictor variables. There are three procedures that are of particular importance here: tests of simple slopes (Cohen & Cohen, 1983), Johnson-Neyman tests of regions of significance (Johnson & Neyman, 1936;Pothoff, 1964;Rogosa, 1980Rogosa, , 1981, and computation of confidence bands for the conditional effects (Rogosa, 1980(Rogosa, , 1981. Although these tests are well developed for standard regression models (see Aiken & West, 1991), we are not aware of any prior work that has extended these tests to the latent curve modeling framework.…”
Section: The Conditional Latent Curve Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now show how we can gain even further information about the conditional effects of x and time by computing regions of significance, a technique originally applied in regression models by Johnson and Neyman (1936) with subsequent extensions by Pothoff (1964) and Rogosa (1980). 4 Regions of significance will allow us to assess at precisely what periods of time the simple slopes of x predicting y pass from significance to nonsignificance.…”
Section: Regions Of Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Johnson-Neyman [1936] technique, as modified by Potthoff [1964], for locating the values of x for which a significant difference can be asserted between the population regression lines, is a simple application of the WorkingHotelling procedure.…”
Section: Summary and Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%