2004
DOI: 10.1037/1082-989x.9.2.220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing Main Effects and Interactions in Latent Curve Analysis.

Abstract: A key strength of latent curve analysis (LCA) is the ability to model individual variability in rates of change as a function of 1 or more explanatory variables. The measurement of time plays a critical role because the explanatory variables multiplicatively interact with time in the prediction of the repeated measures. However, this interaction is not typically capitalized on in LCA because the measure of time is rather subtly incorporated via the factor loading matrix. The authors' goal is to demonstrate bot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
149
0
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
149
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers familiar with the multilevel model of change would think of individual growth curves that make up the observed pattern and observe how the variability increases with time or age (Hoeksma, 2005). As recently shown by Curran, Bauer, and Willoughby (2004), these differences may have profound effects on the validity of researcher's interpretations.…”
Section: Latent Growth Modelsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Researchers familiar with the multilevel model of change would think of individual growth curves that make up the observed pattern and observe how the variability increases with time or age (Hoeksma, 2005). As recently shown by Curran, Bauer, and Willoughby (2004), these differences may have profound effects on the validity of researcher's interpretations.…”
Section: Latent Growth Modelsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Similarly, the J-N technique may be difficult to apply in models involving three-way interactions, such as where x 1 interacts with the x 2 x 3 product term. For situations such as these that may arise in the multilevel growth model, Curran et al (2004) suggested it may be fruitful to blend the pick-a-point approach and J-N technique. Specifically, the conditional effect of x 1 would be plotted as a function of x 2 and examined through the J-N technique at various selected levels of x 3 .…”
Section: Limitations and Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are various ways to calculate the point at which an interaction term between a continuous variable and a dichotomous variable leads to significant differences between the two groups (for a more complete discussion of this issue, see Aiken and West 1991;Curran, Bauer, and Willoughby 2004). Since the main effects of the dichotomous variables are always showing the difference in the two groups when the other variables in the model have values of zero, an easy shorthand way to test for significant differences at particular points is to center the continuous variables at particular values.…”
Section: Interaction Effects: Linking Organizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%