2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.nme.2018.12.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the ion and electron temperature recovery after the ELM-crash at ASDEX upgrade

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper extends our previous work [30][31][32] to the combined analysis of the ion and electron heat transport, as well as the behaviour of the momentum transport during the ELM cycle. Section 2 gives a brief review on the observations of the profile evolution during the ELM cycle.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…This paper extends our previous work [30][31][32] to the combined analysis of the ion and electron heat transport, as well as the behaviour of the momentum transport during the ELM cycle. Section 2 gives a brief review on the observations of the profile evolution during the ELM cycle.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Related gyrokinetic modeling will be reported in [20]. Collectively, these results suggest that MTMs are likely responsible for many of the most prominent magnetic fluctuations observed in the pedestal of tokamaks (see references [18,[21][22][23][24][25][26]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…We note that these values of η e are similar to observations in a number of other devices and operating scenarios. Analysis of electron density and temperature pedestal profiles in ASDEX-Upgrade observed that η e cluster around 1.5-2 in ELMy Hmode [75][76][77]. In Alcator C-mod, η e ∼ 1-2 in EDA H-mode, but becomes increasingly large to 2-4 in ELMy H-mode, or larger yet in I-mode [78,79].…”
Section: Linear Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%