2020
DOI: 10.5194/wcd-1-481-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the intermittency of orographic gravity wave hotspots and its importance for middle atmosphere dynamics

Abstract: Abstract. When orographic gravity waves (OGWs) break, they dissipate their momentum and energy and thereby influence the thermal and dynamical structure of the atmosphere. This OGW forcing mainly takes place in the middle atmosphere. It is zonally asymmetric and strongly intermittent. So-called “OGW hotspot regions” have been shown to exert a large impact on the total wave forcing, in particular in the lower stratosphere (LS). Motivated by this we investigate the asymmetrical distribution of the three-dimensio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the inhomogeneous data distribution, while these spatial clusters represent both large and small scales well, they contain highly uneven numbers of measurements, with a spread of 3 orders of magnitude in population (compared to 5 orders of magnitude using a regular 3° grid). While suitable for mapping, this may introduce spurious intercluster variations in the statistics we compute, namely, the median and Gini's coefficient of concentration G (used previously for GW studies in, e.g., Hindley et al, 2019; Kuchar et al, 2020; Plougonven et al, 2012; Wright et al, 2013). Means were also calculated for all clusters and showed spatially consistent results but with spike values in some clusters due to outliers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the inhomogeneous data distribution, while these spatial clusters represent both large and small scales well, they contain highly uneven numbers of measurements, with a spread of 3 orders of magnitude in population (compared to 5 orders of magnitude using a regular 3° grid). While suitable for mapping, this may introduce spurious intercluster variations in the statistics we compute, namely, the median and Gini's coefficient of concentration G (used previously for GW studies in, e.g., Hindley et al, 2019; Kuchar et al, 2020; Plougonven et al, 2012; Wright et al, 2013). Means were also calculated for all clusters and showed spatially consistent results but with spike values in some clusters due to outliers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 8 of Kuchar et al. (2020), the peak is already preceeded by a few days of significant OGWD anomalies in the region of the hotspot. Therefore, at lag = 0 we can see a response that has already been evolving over a few days prior to lag = 0 under an increasing OGWD forcing overlapping with an imprint of the “hotspot preconditioning.” To assess if nudging has a dynamical impact on the composites, we derived the nudging strength as a residual term from the TEM momentum budget (see Equation ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The identification of strong OGWD events allows to calculate composite anomalies of different variables by subtracting daily values from the monthly climatology of SSW‐free winters. Composites of variables that are analyzed in this study and all processed data are available via the Mendeley Data repository (Kuchar, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations