1984
DOI: 10.1002/crat.2170191016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the influence of various heat treatments and impurity additions on structure changes in Al‐Zn‐Mg alloys

Abstract: I n the last two decades a lot of investigations were performed to obtain more insight in which manner the decomposition structure of the age-bardenable alloys can be directed in a wanted way, that means to attain finely distributed precipitation of the 7'-phase and a narrow precipitation free zone (PFZ) at the grain boundaries (GB) in order to improve their mechanical properties and to diminish their stress corrosion sensitivity. The most applied niethods to put this into practice are two-or even morestep … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1998
1998
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between the values obtained by the two microscopic mechanisms that explain the effect of the composition on the migration of the solutes were discussed in [31]. Alloys 7005 and 7012 have almost the same magnesiumto-zinc ratios; the main points of difference lie in: (a) the absolute value of the Mg content (1.4 wt% in alloy 7005, 2 wt% in alloy 7012), a factor that seems to influence the diffusion processes rather strongly in special cases [30,32]; (b) the quaternary element (Mn in alloy 7005, Cu in alloy 7012). It is known that additions of Cu to Al-Zn-Mg alloys favour the formation of GP II zones and delay the rate of η -precipitation, while Mn acts in the opposite way [33].…”
Section: Recovery After Reversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between the values obtained by the two microscopic mechanisms that explain the effect of the composition on the migration of the solutes were discussed in [31]. Alloys 7005 and 7012 have almost the same magnesiumto-zinc ratios; the main points of difference lie in: (a) the absolute value of the Mg content (1.4 wt% in alloy 7005, 2 wt% in alloy 7012), a factor that seems to influence the diffusion processes rather strongly in special cases [30,32]; (b) the quaternary element (Mn in alloy 7005, Cu in alloy 7012). It is known that additions of Cu to Al-Zn-Mg alloys favour the formation of GP II zones and delay the rate of η -precipitation, while Mn acts in the opposite way [33].…”
Section: Recovery After Reversionmentioning
confidence: 99%