2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the influence of laser defocusing in Selective Laser Melting of 316L

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
62
1
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
62
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The connection between the shape of the laser beam profile and the melt pool was extensively studied in the literature [51,91,92]. Furthermore, the top-hat shape employed in laser welding [93] was shown to produce keyholes having a shorter depth and, for this reason, Tenbrock et al [94] recently applied this profile in laser powder bed fusion of 316 L stainless steel, showing that an efficient LPBF processes can also be realized by applying diode lasers as long as a proper defined intensity threshold is exceeded (I ≈ 8-10 × 10 5 W/cm 2 [94]).…”
Section: Heat Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The connection between the shape of the laser beam profile and the melt pool was extensively studied in the literature [51,91,92]. Furthermore, the top-hat shape employed in laser welding [93] was shown to produce keyholes having a shorter depth and, for this reason, Tenbrock et al [94] recently applied this profile in laser powder bed fusion of 316 L stainless steel, showing that an efficient LPBF processes can also be realized by applying diode lasers as long as a proper defined intensity threshold is exceeded (I ≈ 8-10 × 10 5 W/cm 2 [94]).…”
Section: Heat Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also studies on the influence of shielding gas on weld geometry [16]. Individual publications raise the subject of focusing the beam on the shape of penetration and depth of penetration [17,18,19,20]. Unfortunately, the impact of this parameter has not been clearly defined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One challenge is that the best set of parameters (even if validated) is no longer valid as soon as you change the laser you are working with (i.e., when using a different manufacturing machine), the powder batch (e.g., in terms of chemical analysis, particle size distribution, powder morphology) [109], or the geometry (e.g., sharp features, heavy sections or portion of inclined surfaces facing loose powder). A lot of work has been performed in order to investigate the optimal working conditions of L-PBF and guidelines for the selections of parameters [110][111][112][113][114][115][116].…”
Section: Laser Powder Bed Fusion Working Principles and Process-relatmentioning
confidence: 99%