2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2019.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the influence of groundwater table fluctuations on oil thickness in a well related to an LNAPL contaminated aquifer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When the LNAPL contamination state of an area reaches relevant levels, it is common to find a thickness of free-phase supernatant product between groundwater and air. In this case, the physical behavior of the LNAPL layer is also controlled by groundwater table fluctuation over time, which affects the subsurface distribution of the different LNAPL phases (Gatsios et al 2018;Atteia et al 2019). This represents a key aspect to consider when dealing with a site-specific environmental characterization or remediation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the LNAPL contamination state of an area reaches relevant levels, it is common to find a thickness of free-phase supernatant product between groundwater and air. In this case, the physical behavior of the LNAPL layer is also controlled by groundwater table fluctuation over time, which affects the subsurface distribution of the different LNAPL phases (Gatsios et al 2018;Atteia et al 2019). This represents a key aspect to consider when dealing with a site-specific environmental characterization or remediation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes it possible to determine the influence of the water table fluctuations by monitoring the evolution of LNAPL thickness relative to the water table fluctuations. In relatively recent efforts, researchers have used linear and nonlinear optimization models coupled with numerical models to develop effective remediation strategies consistent with complex objective functions (Qin et al 2009; Dokou and Karatzas 2013; Matos de Souza et al 2016; Atteia et al 2019; Sookhak Lari et al 2019). For such numerical models, multiple variables including LNAPL and subsurface properties, as well as initial and boundary conditions, need to be known (e.g., the rate and volume of LNAPL released into the subsurface, the timing and magnitude of potential fluid saturation path changes from precipitation and water table fluctuations, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reality, however, the relationship between the apparent LNAPL thickness in the observation well and the actual LNAPL thickness in the soil is complex (Farr et al 1990;Lenhard and Parker 1990;Ballestero et al 1994;EPA 1996;Deska and Ociepa 2013;Gatsios et al 2018). Due to the potential delay between the LNAPL movement in the soil and that in the observation well, the thickness of the apparent LNAPL in the observation well can vary significantly-and may even disappear from the observation well during the entire period of elevated water table levels-underpinning a complex relationship between the actual LNAPL thickness in a soil and the apparent LNAPL thickness in an observation well (Steffy et al 1998;Aral and Liao 2002;Atteia et al 2019). Some methods have been proposed for evaluating the actual LNAPL thickness in soil based on the Bail-Down test, which consists of rapid removal of as much of the LNAPL in an observation well as is practical, followed by monitoring of the elevations of the LNAPL/air and LNAPL/water interfaces in the observation well (Yaniga and Demko 1983;Gruszcenski 1987;Hughes et al 1988;Wagner et al 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Groundwater table fluctuations can change the subsurface distribution of the different LNAPL phases [7][8][9]. As the water table rises or falls, free LNAPL may become entrapped or entrapped LNAPL may become free LNAPL, respectfully [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To provide insights concerning subsurface LNAPL behavior and test predictive models, investigators conducted small-and intermediate-scale laboratory experiments and field investigations [7,8,10,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. The works involved entrapment of LNAPL, the effect of water table fluctuations, assessing LNAPL recoverability, transient effects, and other aspects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%