2002
DOI: 10.1080/01431160110107725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the influence of canopy structure on the radar backscattering of mangrove forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
2
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
41
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of persistent cloud cover in the tropical and subtropical regions, radar imagery is an appropriate option compared with optical remotely sensed data. Radar data deliver information that is useful for characterizing the cover extent of mangrove surfaces [146], structural parameters [9,[81][82][83]85,87,102,147,148], flooding boundaries [84], health status [88,149], deforestation status [150], and the amount of total biomass [81][82][83]85]. Studies were performed at different locations in various countries based on different radar data (Mexico: RADARSAT-1 SAR, [149] Several investigations were carried out to examine and describe the effects and relationships among mangrove canopy, stand structures, and the backscattering response of a SAR system, exemplified by the NASA/JPL airborne SAR (AIRSAR) system at different frequencies (C-, L-, P-band) and polarization modes (HH, VV, HV).…”
Section: Overview Of Mangrove-mapping Studies and Methods Based On Ramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of persistent cloud cover in the tropical and subtropical regions, radar imagery is an appropriate option compared with optical remotely sensed data. Radar data deliver information that is useful for characterizing the cover extent of mangrove surfaces [146], structural parameters [9,[81][82][83]85,87,102,147,148], flooding boundaries [84], health status [88,149], deforestation status [150], and the amount of total biomass [81][82][83]85]. Studies were performed at different locations in various countries based on different radar data (Mexico: RADARSAT-1 SAR, [149] Several investigations were carried out to examine and describe the effects and relationships among mangrove canopy, stand structures, and the backscattering response of a SAR system, exemplified by the NASA/JPL airborne SAR (AIRSAR) system at different frequencies (C-, L-, P-band) and polarization modes (HH, VV, HV).…”
Section: Overview Of Mangrove-mapping Studies and Methods Based On Ramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and external components (e.g., size, geometry, and orientation of leaves, trunks, branches, and aerial or stilt roots) result in a specific backscatter signal (see Figure 4). Mougin et al [81] and Proisy et al [82,83] investigated the relationships between airborne SAR data, for various polarization and multifrequency modes, and the structural components of mangroves for a study area in French Guiana. The following table (see Table 1) describes these interactions and the general relationships found by Wang and Imhoff [84], Aschbacher et al [9], Kasischke et al [80], Mougin et al [81], Proisy et al [82,83,85], Lucas et al [86,87], and Kovacs et al [88].…”
Section: Expression Of Mangrove Backscatter In Radar Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have related radar backscattering with the structural parameters of mangrove vegetation such as homogeneous forest canopies to estimate above-ground biomass (AGB) [25][26][27][28][29]. Recently, Kovacs et al [30,31] estimated structural attributes of degraded mangrove forests on the Pacific coast of México using multi-polarized C-band (Radarsat-2) and L-band images (ALOS PALSAR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, the values for these two variables specified in Section 3.3 (Table 1) These results indicate that in the first case (LAI true ) the olive grove canopy is very thin with a very low attenuation, while in the second case (LAI eff ) these values are higher, which appear to be more realistic and according to this vegetation cover. Moreover, as the coefficient of agreement is better for effective LAI, the characterization of this type of canopy by means of this biophysical variable is proven to be more acceptable, and might also imply that the grouping effect of the vegetation constituents (or their geometrical properties), is better taken into account by this type of microwave scattering models, as it has been suggested in [51,53,54]. Finally, these statements are also confirmed by means of the corresponding regression fits between simulated and measured backscattering coefficients depicted in Figure 15a and 15b, where it is noticed that the simulated 0 vv σ of the canopy using LAI eff exhibits a higher dependency with the measured 0 vv σ (Figure 15(b)).…”
Section: Rt Vegetation Scattering Models-modified Xu and Steven Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%