2018
DOI: 10.3389/fphy.2018.00044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Importance of Spatial and Velocity Resolution in the Hybrid-Vlasov Modeling of Collisionless Shocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compressive waves in the foreshock can have even larger amplitudes closer to the shock (Hoppe et al, 1981). This may be due to the spatial resolution in our simulation, which can limit the steepening of the waves (Pfau-Kempf et al, 2018). This may also explain why the caviton shown in Fig.…”
Section: Comparison With Spacecraft Observationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compressive waves in the foreshock can have even larger amplitudes closer to the shock (Hoppe et al, 1981). This may be due to the spatial resolution in our simulation, which can limit the steepening of the waves (Pfau-Kempf et al, 2018). This may also explain why the caviton shown in Fig.…”
Section: Comparison With Spacecraft Observationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…CC BY 4.0 License. possible consequences for the formation of magnetosheath structures such as jets (Hietala et al 2009, Palmroth et al 2018. Any such effects may be modulated by both SHFAs impinging on the shock and erosion such as seen associated with this magnetosheath cavity.…”
Section: Shock Erosionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most energetic ions may therefore not be properly described. In terms of the wave frequency range, the main limitation comes from the spatial and temporal resolution of the simulation, which limit the steepening of the waves and the development of high‐frequency oscillations such as the whistler wave packets commonly observed near the quasi‐parallel bow shock (Pfau‐Kempf et al, ). In the present study, we will therefore concentrate on waves at periods above 1 s, which are properly described in the current runs.…”
Section: Description Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…over energy by rapidly stepping the analyser potential, simultaneously measuring over a range of angles in the plane containing the spin axis, while scanning over angles in the plane perpendicular to the spin axis with spacecraft rotation (Rosenbauer et al, 1977(Rosenbauer et al, , 1981. The spacecraft spin rate (60 s in this case) is the maximum solar wind VDF time resolution that can be achieved with such a setup, unless multiple instrument heads are installed (as has been done, for instance, for the Fast Plasma Investigation instruments on NASA's Magnetospheric MultiScale spacecraft; Pollock et al, 2016). A similar situation occurs on the Cluster satellites .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%