2018
DOI: 10.1029/2018ja025466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foreshock Properties at Typical and Enhanced Interplanetary Magnetic Field Strengths: Results From Hybrid‐Vlasov Simulations

Abstract: In this paper, we present a detailed study of the effects of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) strength on the foreshock properties at small and large scales. Two simulation runs performed with the hybrid‐Vlasov code Vlasiator with identical setup but with different IMF strengths, namely, 5 and 10 nT, are compared. We find that the bow shock position and shape are roughly identical in both runs, due to the quasi‐radial IMF orientation, in agreement with previous magnetohydrodynamic simulations and theory… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
51
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(127 reference statements)
6
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Atypical ion VDFs are observed in conjunction with the unusual wave activity. During one event, we find clear evidence of two distinct FABs in cyclotron resonance with the waves observed shortly afterward, consistent with previous numerical works (Turc et al, ). In another, the FAB is accompanied by a second suprathermal population at nonzero pitch angle, which might have evolved from a second FAB, due to gyrophase trapping (Mazelle et al, ; Kempf et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Atypical ion VDFs are observed in conjunction with the unusual wave activity. During one event, we find clear evidence of two distinct FABs in cyclotron resonance with the waves observed shortly afterward, consistent with previous numerical works (Turc et al, ). In another, the FAB is accompanied by a second suprathermal population at nonzero pitch angle, which might have evolved from a second FAB, due to gyrophase trapping (Mazelle et al, ; Kempf et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This effect may be caused by the differing scales of foreshock structures, with S2 foreshock dynamics causing clumped enhancements of reflected particles in the vicinity of the shock, and the strong ULF and SLAMS signatures in S1 causing corresponding rarefications as well as enhancements. This phenomenon was investigated in Turc et al (2018), as shown in their Figure 2, panels b through d.…”
Section: Test-particle Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Vlasiator is capable of modeling a number of ion kinetic effects even without resolving ion kinetic scales spatially (Pfau-Kempf et al, 2018), and has been used for a number of interesting foreshock and bow shock studies (Palmroth et al, 2015;Pfau-Kempf et al, 2016;Turc et al, 2018;Blanco-Cano et al, 2018) In this paper, we use two datasets (simulations S1 and S2) modeling two different bow shock strengths and interplanetary magnetic field intensities. Results from these simulations have previously been published in Palmroth et al (2015) and Turc et al (2018). They are ecliptic plane (x − y) 2D-3V simulations (2D in the spatial domain, 3D in the velocity domain) parametrized using the GSE coordinate system with no tilt for the Earth's dipole.…”
Section: Vlasiator Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the Sun-Earth line in Run 2B. This could be related to foreshock disturbances being weaker at lower M A , since the density of suprathermal ions is reduced (Turc et al, 2015(Turc et al, , 2018.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%