2019
DOI: 10.1155/2019/9784252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Implementation of a Dynamic Direction Modulation System with Vector Modulators

Abstract: Dynamic directional modulation (DDM) has already proven to be an efficient technique to achieve physical layer security in wireless communications. System architectures based on vector modulators provide a flexible framework to implement synthesis methods that allow us to obtain increased security and/or independent multichannel transmissions. However, the implementation of DDM with vector modulators requires an accurate calibration (amplitude and phase) of every component in the RF path. In this contribution,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 depicts the measured constellations in the observation angle before adding AWGN where it can be deduced that the received signal becomes noisier as PEDM decreases. This aspect was already addressed with simulations in [24], showing that this noise could be eliminated through an accurate calibration (magnitude and phase) of the transmitters return loss. In our case, the board specifications only mention return losses higher than 10 dB and, although they are good enough for a standard application, they can produce an increasingly noisy constellation at φs as the PEDM is reduced in order to achieve a narrower secure beam width.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 depicts the measured constellations in the observation angle before adding AWGN where it can be deduced that the received signal becomes noisier as PEDM decreases. This aspect was already addressed with simulations in [24], showing that this noise could be eliminated through an accurate calibration (magnitude and phase) of the transmitters return loss. In our case, the board specifications only mention return losses higher than 10 dB and, although they are good enough for a standard application, they can produce an increasingly noisy constellation at φs as the PEDM is reduced in order to achieve a narrower secure beam width.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%