2017
DOI: 10.1163/15685411-00003104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the identity of Chiloplacus magnus Rashid & Heyns, 1990 and C. insularis Orselli & Vinciguerra, 2002 (Rhabditida: Cephalobidae), two confusable species

Abstract: Two very similar species of the genus Chiloplacus, namely C. magnus and C. insularis, are re-described and compared based on type material as well as Iberian specimens. Relevant new information is obtained for their characterisation and for elucidating their identity with more accuracy. Special mention is deserved by the findings regarding: i) the morphology of the lateral field at vulval level; and ii) the location of the vulva, which is either midventral or subventral, two remarkable traits that were origina… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The terminology used for the morphology of stoma and spicules-gubernaculum follows the proposals by Baldwin et al (2004) and Abolafia and Peña-Santiago (2017) , respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The terminology used for the morphology of stoma and spicules-gubernaculum follows the proposals by Baldwin et al (2004) and Abolafia and Peña-Santiago (2017) , respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morphometric measurements were done by the help of inbuilt software of phase contrast microscope (Nikon DS-L1). The terminology used for the morphology of pharynx, stoma and spicules follows the proposals by De Ley et al (1995) and Abolafia and Peña-Santiago (2017), respectively.…”
Section: Isolation and Examination Of Nematodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The terminology used for the morphology of stoma and spicules follows the proposals by De Ley et al (1995) and Abolafia & Peña-Santiago (2017), respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%