1992
DOI: 10.1214/aoap/1177005588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Gittins Index for Multiarmed Bandits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
111
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 220 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
111
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This gives rise to new interpretations of the indices as prices or retirement options. For example, we can obtain a new interpretation of indices in the context of branching bandits as retirement options, thus generalizing the interpretation of Whittle [61] and Weber [59] for the indices of the classical multiarmed bandit problem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This gives rise to new interpretations of the indices as prices or retirement options. For example, we can obtain a new interpretation of indices in the context of branching bandits as retirement options, thus generalizing the interpretation of Whittle [61] and Weber [59] for the indices of the classical multiarmed bandit problem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Varaiya, Walrand and Buyukkoc [58] and Weiss [60] provided different proofs based on interchange arguments. Weber [59] and Tsitsiklis [56] outlined intuitive proofs.…”
Section: Indexable Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the underlying properties of the bandit problem that make such a simple policy optimal. Frostig and Weiss (1999) surveyed four proofs for the optimality of the Gittins index in the literature: Gittins' original proof of interchange argument (Gittins (1979)), Weber's fair charge argument (Weber (1992)), Whittle's dual Lagrangian approach (Whittle (1980)), and Bertsimas and Niño-Mora's linear programming approach of achievable region and generalized conservation laws (Bertsimas and Niño-Mora (1996)). Although these proofs are different in the details, they share a common strategy: the proof starts with a study of a single-armed bandit process, and the optimal policy is solved for in this restricted case.…”
Section: No Switching Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To name a few example, a worker who switches jobs must pay non-negligible costs. 18 16 Proof by Weber (1992) can be translated into Whittle (1980)'s proof by setting fair charge γ equal to (1 − β)M. 17 This property also holds when switching arms is costly. I will discuss this in detail in Asawa and Teneketzis (1996) in Section 5.…”
Section: Switching Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An extensive literature exists outlining a range of extensions and developments of Gittins' classical work while various schemes for index computation have been proposed. See, for example, Whittle (1980), Weber (1992), Katehakis and Veinott (1987) and Bertsimas and Niño-Mora (1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%