2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.0960-1627.2004.00189.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On The Fundamental Theorem Of Asset Pricing: Random Constraints And Bang‐Bang No‐Arbitrage Criteria

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
10

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
10
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas marginal arbitrage is related to market prices associated with infinitesimal trades, scalable arbitrage is related to marginal prices contained in the closure of the whole range of possible marginal prices. In the presence of portfolio constraints, the martingale property is replaced by a more general one involving normal cones of the constraints much like in Pham and Touzi [32], Napp [27], Evstigneev, Schürger and Taksar [13] and Rokhlin [42,44] in the case of perfectly liquid markets with a cash account.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas marginal arbitrage is related to market prices associated with infinitesimal trades, scalable arbitrage is related to marginal prices contained in the closure of the whole range of possible marginal prices. In the presence of portfolio constraints, the martingale property is replaced by a more general one involving normal cones of the constraints much like in Pham and Touzi [32], Napp [27], Evstigneev, Schürger and Taksar [13] and Rokhlin [42,44] in the case of perfectly liquid markets with a cash account.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Example 3. 16 We consider the predictably convexity introduced in Example 2.9; and illustrate representations of Q, Q 0 and (ρ 0 ) * for predictably convex models. The following argument is based on Section 6 of [1].…”
Section: Proposition 38mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…где ^(R) -сг-алгебра борелевских множеств R. Такие модели рассма тривались, например, в работах [24], [12], [26]. Итак, пусть множество W состоит из процессов вида (2.…”
Section: примеры множеств удовлетворяющих введенным акси омам ниже unclassified