2018
DOI: 10.1017/s1366728918000329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the flexibility of bilingual language control: The effect of language context

Abstract: How flexible is bilingual language control and how does it adapt to the linguistic context of a conversation? We address this by looking at the pattern of switch costs in contexts involving mostly the use of a dominant or non-dominant language. This linguistic context affected switching patterns: switching was equally costly for both languages in a dominant (L1) context, while switching was harder for the weaker language in the non-dominant (L2) context. Also, naming latencies for each language were affected b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
49
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(121 reference statements)
6
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In bilingual production studies using single words, a dominant language is typically responded to more slowly in mixed than in unilingual language contexts ( Christoffels et al, 2007 , 2016 ). Correspondingly, in production studies using EEG, the LPC has been reported to be smaller (less positive) for the dominant language in a mixed than a unilingual context ( Timmer et al, 2019 ). This has been attributed to the overall inhibition of the dominant language in the mixed-language contexts in production 3 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In bilingual production studies using single words, a dominant language is typically responded to more slowly in mixed than in unilingual language contexts ( Christoffels et al, 2007 , 2016 ). Correspondingly, in production studies using EEG, the LPC has been reported to be smaller (less positive) for the dominant language in a mixed than a unilingual context ( Timmer et al, 2019 ). This has been attributed to the overall inhibition of the dominant language in the mixed-language contexts in production 3 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This hypothesis distinguishes three language switching contexts, relating to the intensity and ease of switching: (1) a single language context where one language only is spoken; (2) a dual language context whereby language cues need to be closely monitored in order to select the ‘right’ language; and (3) a dense code-switching context, where both languages are interchangeably used—often even inter-sententially—but no clear monitoring/inhibiting of one language is necessary. Findings on adaptive language control mechanisms that change relative to the language context [35], the observation that a high daily exposure to a bilingual’s different languages better resolves competition between languages [25], and the observations on EBFs and language demands above, all strengthen the evidence that the greatest cognitive benefits are observed in a dual-language context. The continuous adjustment of the control mechanisms could train the brain to become more attentive and efficient in switching between languages.…”
Section: Individual Differences In Bilingual Experiences In Older mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The importance of language context has been emphasized by the adaptive control hypothesis (Green & Abutalebi, 2013) and has been widely discussed in bilingualism studies. For example, one study investigated language control in contexts involving mostly the use of a dominant or of a nondominant language (Timmer, Christoffels, & Costa, 2019) and revealed that language context modulates the functioning of bilingual language control.…”
Section: The Effect Of Language Context On Language Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%