2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the feasibility of estimating contemporary effective population size (Ne) for genetic conservation and monitoring of forest trees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, all studied populations, except for WGC3, are defined as being at risk of loss of adaptive potential because of critically low N e . However, we know that accurate estimates of N e may be especially difficult in trees because some aspects of their population biology violate methodological assumptions of N e estimation (Santos‐del‐Blanco et al, 2022). The values presented here may be down‐biased because of spatially restricted sampling and the intensive gene flow (Beridze et al, 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, all studied populations, except for WGC3, are defined as being at risk of loss of adaptive potential because of critically low N e . However, we know that accurate estimates of N e may be especially difficult in trees because some aspects of their population biology violate methodological assumptions of N e estimation (Santos‐del‐Blanco et al, 2022). The values presented here may be down‐biased because of spatially restricted sampling and the intensive gene flow (Beridze et al, 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We estimated an effective population size ( N e ) for the SFKR of 17.2 (95% CI = 14.3–20.3). N e for upstream and downstream Big Double Creek sites were infinite, which can be caused by low sample size or large populations (Santos‐del‐Blanco et al., 2022; Table 3). Several sites also had infinite upper‐bound confidence intervals, indicating that our estimates of effective population size have low confidence, likely due to small sample sizes (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effective population size ( Ne ) was assessed using the linkage disequilibrium method implemented in NeEstimator v2.1 (Do et al 2014). In forest tree species, due to their peculiar life-history traits, reliable estimates of Ne should be obtained only for isolated and small populations (typically less than 500 reproductive trees) (Santos-del-Blanco et al 2022). In our dataset, the populations that met such requirements are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%