2005
DOI: 10.1121/1.1921548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the externalization of virtual sound images in headphone reproduction: A Wiener filter approach

Abstract: In-head localization of sound images is a critical problem in headphone reproduction. The paper investigates the degree of externalization in terms of the distance of auditory images for various synthesis and reproduction cases. An effective binaural headphone system was constructed by way of binaural synthesis using head-related impulse responses and individual headphone equalization using Wiener filter theory. The headphone system designed had an average reproduction performance error of 2.4% for five subjec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
32
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
5
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Hartmann and Wittenberg (1996), the synthesis of a distant source leads to a perfectly externalized image if the HRTFs are properly individualized, whereas it leads to an image that is often perceived on the surface of the skull if the HRTFs are non-individualized. With five subjects and short bursts of white noise reproduced in the horizontal plane, Kim and Choi (2005) observed that sound sources synthesized with individualized HRTFs were perceived at a greater and more consistent distance than those synthesized with non-individualized HRTFs. On the other hand, with speech stimuli, neither Møller et al (1996) nor Begault et al (2001) reported a significant difference in externalization between individualized and non-individualized binaural synthesis.…”
Section: A Individualized Vs Non-individualized Hrtfmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to Hartmann and Wittenberg (1996), the synthesis of a distant source leads to a perfectly externalized image if the HRTFs are properly individualized, whereas it leads to an image that is often perceived on the surface of the skull if the HRTFs are non-individualized. With five subjects and short bursts of white noise reproduced in the horizontal plane, Kim and Choi (2005) observed that sound sources synthesized with individualized HRTFs were perceived at a greater and more consistent distance than those synthesized with non-individualized HRTFs. On the other hand, with speech stimuli, neither Møller et al (1996) nor Begault et al (2001) reported a significant difference in externalization between individualized and non-individualized binaural synthesis.…”
Section: A Individualized Vs Non-individualized Hrtfmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Using virtual sources synthesized in the horizontal plane with non-individualized HRTFs and no head tracking, Laws and Platte (1975), Kim and Choi (2005), and Begault and Wenzel (1993) observed that lateral stimuli were almost always judged to be external, whereas frontal or rear stimuli were much more likely to be perceived inside the head. Note that Begault and Wenzel (1993) used anechoic speech stimuli.…”
Section: B Frontal and Rear Sources Vs Lateral Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is difficult, due to the high variability, to obtain one filter characteristic which is valid generally for all users [KC00]. The externalization of virtual sound images without additional signal processing in headphone reproduction is often a problematic issue, too [KC05].…”
Section: Hrt Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to some shortcomings in studying forward masking with loudspeakers for their transient properties, at least those having short delay time. However, eliminating the effect of inside-the-head localization is essential when studying spatial unmasking with headphones [10,11] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%