Abstract:The use of nonintrusive virtual environments is gaining more and more importance but was focused mainly on addressing the visual sense. However, the human perception consists not only of visual input and thus it would be worthwhile to create multimodal and interactive virtual environments. This thesis describes the techniques required to include the acoustic component into virtual environments and the implementation of a software system, which creates complex artificial acoustical scenes in real time. The syst… Show more
“…First introduced by Atal and Schröder [38], CTC makes it possible to present binaural stimuli via loudspeakers. Detailed information about the theory and procedure can be found in Møller [39], Schmitz [40], and Lentz [41].…”
“…The used HRTFs were those of the artificial head described in reproduction method III. Since the subject'sm ovements were restricted to ±1cmi nt ranslation and ±2 • in rotation, the subject wasalways within the sweet spot [41].…”
In ap revious study the authors examined intentional switching in auditory selective attention using ad ichoticlistening paradigm. In the present study this paradigm wase xtended to more natural and realistic environments by changing it to ab inaural-listening paradigm in which human performance with different methods of spatial reproduction were compared. Four reproduction methods were used: real sources in an anechoic environment, individual binaural synthesis reproduced with headphones, non-individual binaural synthesis reproduced with headphones, and non-individual binaural synthesis reproduced with twol oudspeakers and Cross-Talk-Cancellation-Filters. Speech of twospeakers waspresented simultaneously to subjects from twoout of eight different directions. Guided by avisual cue, subjects were asked to categorize the target'sspeech while ignoring the distractor's speech. Results showed greater reaction times and error rates for non-individual repro duction methods. The influences of the spatial transition of the target-speaker (switch or repetition of speaker'sd irection in space)a nd of the spatial arrangement of the twospeakers were largely identical across reproduction methods, even though it wasg enerally easier to filter out distractor'ss peech when using real sources. The findings suggest that the reproduction methods can be usefully applied to study auditory attention with only very little loss in accuracy.
“…First introduced by Atal and Schröder [38], CTC makes it possible to present binaural stimuli via loudspeakers. Detailed information about the theory and procedure can be found in Møller [39], Schmitz [40], and Lentz [41].…”
“…The used HRTFs were those of the artificial head described in reproduction method III. Since the subject'sm ovements were restricted to ±1cmi nt ranslation and ±2 • in rotation, the subject wasalways within the sweet spot [41].…”
In ap revious study the authors examined intentional switching in auditory selective attention using ad ichoticlistening paradigm. In the present study this paradigm wase xtended to more natural and realistic environments by changing it to ab inaural-listening paradigm in which human performance with different methods of spatial reproduction were compared. Four reproduction methods were used: real sources in an anechoic environment, individual binaural synthesis reproduced with headphones, non-individual binaural synthesis reproduced with headphones, and non-individual binaural synthesis reproduced with twol oudspeakers and Cross-Talk-Cancellation-Filters. Speech of twospeakers waspresented simultaneously to subjects from twoout of eight different directions. Guided by avisual cue, subjects were asked to categorize the target'sspeech while ignoring the distractor's speech. Results showed greater reaction times and error rates for non-individual repro duction methods. The influences of the spatial transition of the target-speaker (switch or repetition of speaker'sd irection in space)a nd of the spatial arrangement of the twospeakers were largely identical across reproduction methods, even though it wasg enerally easier to filter out distractor'ss peech when using real sources. The findings suggest that the reproduction methods can be usefully applied to study auditory attention with only very little loss in accuracy.
“…Participants' head movements were constrained using a headrest, resulting in average front-back and back-front confusion rates of 13.4% and 15.7%, respectively. Lentz (2008), however, stressed the importance of dynamic aspects and reported a substantial reduction of reversals in the interactive binaural auralization systems compared to the static variants. This notion was corroborated by perceptual experiments where VSSs were synthesized based on a two-loudspeaker CTC system playing back pulsed pink noise stimuli with 200 ms duration and successive 500 ms silence interval.…”
Auralization systems for auditory research should ideally be validated by perceptual experiments, as well as objective measures. This study employed perceptual tests to evaluate a recently proposed binaural real-time auralization system for hearing aid (HA) users. The dynamic localization of real sound sources was compared with that of virtualized ones, reproduced binaurally over headphones, loudspeakers with crosstalk cancellation (CTC) filters, research HAs, or combined via loudspeakers with CTC filters and research HAs under free-field conditions. System-inherent properties affecting localization cues were identified and their effects on overall horizontal localization, reversal rates, and angular error metrics were assessed. The general localization performance in combined reproduction was found to fall between what was measured for loudspeakers with CTC filters and research HAs alone. Reproduction via research HAs alone resulted in the highest reversal rates and angular errors. While combined reproduction helped decrease the reversal rates, no significant effect was observed on the angular error metrics. However, combined reproduction resulted in the same overall horizontal source localization performance as measured for real sound sources, while improving localization compared with reproduction over research HAs alone. Collectively, the results with respect to combined reproduction can be considered a performance indicator for future experiments involving HA users.
“…It is generally assumed that further increasing the distance does not change the characteristics of the HRIRs essentially [1]. However, it is known that HRIRs change signi cantly for nearby sources [2]. Such HRIRs are typically termed as near-eld HRIRs.…”
Head-related impulse responses (HRIRs), which are measured from an acoustic source to the left and right ear, characterize the acoustic properties of the outer ear. Due to the involved measurement effort, HRIRs are typically available only for source positions on a circle or surface of a sphere. Range extrapolation techniques aim at calculating HRIRs with a different source distance. A number of techniques have been proposed in the past which are based on expansions of HRIRs in terms of surface spherical harmonics. This paper presents an alternative approach which bases on the interpretation of a BRIR dataset as virtual loudspeaker array which is driven by Wave Field Synthesis in order to achieve range extrapolation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.