On the Estimation of Treatment Effects with Endogenous Misreporting

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in On the Estimation of Treatment Effects with Endogenous Misreporting MARCH 2018Any opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but IZA takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity. The IZA Institute of Labor Economics is an independent economic research institute that conducts research in labor economics and offers evidence-based policy advice on labor market issues. Supported by the Deutsche Post Foundation, IZA runs the world's largest network of economists, whose research aims to provide answers to the global labor market challenges of our time. Our key objective is to build bridges between academic research, policymakers and society. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author. show that failure to account for endogenous misreporting can result in the estimate of the treatment effect having an opposite sign from the true effect. We present an expression for the asymptotic bias of both OLS and IV estimators and discuss the conditions under which sign reversal may occur. We provide a method for eliminating this bias when researchers have access to information related to both participation and misreporting. We establish the consistency and asymptotic normality of our estimator and assess its small sample performance through Monte Carlo simulations. An empirical example is given to illustrate the proposed method. JEL Classification:C35, C51

War and Social Attitudes: Revisiting Consensus Views

“…If self-reported measures must be used, it would be well-advised to address potential endogeneity arising from selective misreporting. To this effect, researchers can even explicitly model misreporting following the novel approaches of Almada et al (forthcoming) and Nguimkeuy et al (2016). We expect this area of research to grow as awareness spreads regarding the severity of this important yet oft-overlooked source of endogeneity.…”

The Effect of SNAP and School Food Programs on Food Security, Diet Quality, and Food Spending: Sensitivity to Program Reporting Error

“…There have been a number of articles analyzing the impact of measurement error in a binary independent variable on estimated regression coefficients (Aigner ; Bollinger ; Hausman et al ; Lewbel ; Hu ; DiTraglia and Garcia‐Jimeno ; Hu et al ; Nguimkeu et al ). Here, we derive the bias in OLS and IV both for the case where the measurement error is exogenous and where it is endogenous, for a simple model with no additional covariates other than the binary variable (for a derivation of bias with an additional covariate vector, see Nguimkeu et al ).…”

Estimating the Associations between SNAP and Food Insecurity, Obesity, and Food Purchases with Imperfect Administrative Measures of Participation

“…A growing literature documents the problems with relying on survey measures of program participation, which suffer from significant reporting error, when conducting impact evaluations (Meyer, Mok, and Sullivan, 2015;Mittag, 2016;Nguimkeu et al, 2017). Administrative data are ordinarily assumed to be the "gold standard" to overcoming these econometric challenges, but relatively little evidence exists on the potential problems with administrative records or econometric strategies to address them.…”

“…Several studies have documented the expected negative relationship between SNAP and food insecurity (Van Hook & Ballistreri, 2006;Nord & Prell, 2011;Schmidt et al, 2016), but others have found statistically insignificant or even positive associations (Gundersen & Oliveira, 2001;Hofferth, 2004;Huffman & Jensen, 2003;Wilde et al, 2005;Hoynes & Schanzenbach, 2015). SNAP is also often found to be positively correlated with obesity, but some studies find insignificant or negative effects (Meyerhoefer and Pylypchuk, 2008;Gundersen, 2015;Nguimkeu et al, 2017;Denteh, 2017).…”