2013
DOI: 10.1002/sim.6015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the estimation of the reproduction number based on misreported epidemic data

Abstract: Epidemic data often suffer from underreporting and delay in reporting. In this paper, we investigated the impact of delays and underreporting on estimates of reproduction number. We used a thinned version of the epidemic renewal equation to describe the epidemic process while accounting for the underlying reporting system. Assuming a constant reporting parameter, we used different delay patterns to represent the delay structure in our model. Instead of assuming a fixed delay distribution, we estimated the dela… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
82
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(45 reference statements)
3
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These new datasets and new approaches of measuring the burden of influenza should be compared with the regression‐based estimates of excess burden as a way of assessing representativeness and as an aid to interpreting any differences. When dealing with near real‐time data, delays in reporting make the interpretation of weekly data considerably more complex 26, 27, 28. Use of an ARI case definition to identify cases for viral identification will result in the identification of a much larger proportion of hospitalizations due to influenza than use of an ILI definition, although at a cost of considerably higher testing rates 25.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These new datasets and new approaches of measuring the burden of influenza should be compared with the regression‐based estimates of excess burden as a way of assessing representativeness and as an aid to interpreting any differences. When dealing with near real‐time data, delays in reporting make the interpretation of weekly data considerably more complex 26, 27, 28. Use of an ARI case definition to identify cases for viral identification will result in the identification of a much larger proportion of hospitalizations due to influenza than use of an ILI definition, although at a cost of considerably higher testing rates 25.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though overall, the morbidity burden for influenza, RSV, and ORV is similar; the age distribution is very different with the rate of RSV- When dealing with near real-time data, delays in reporting make the interpretation of weekly data considerably more complex. [26][27][28] Use of an ARI case definition to identify cases for viral identification will result in the identification of a much larger proportion of hospitalizations due to influenza than use of an ILI definition, although at a cost of considerably higher testing rates. 25…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these could bias z s and alter declaration times, some of these more realistic dynamics can be included as future extensions. We can adjust for delays by applying nowcasting techniques [24] and include heterogeneity by using a negative binomial renewal model [1]. Future generalisations of our method will consider how data about reporting trends (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a standard model for under-reporting [6,24] and implies the following statistical relationship…”
Section: Under-reported and Imported Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately we do not have data to assess the magnitude or the variability of underreporting. Also, inconsistent reporting with undocumented backlogging and the absence of dates of disease onset may affect the accuracy of the estimates and need to be taken into consideration when interpreting the results [ 27 ]. Furthermore, the district-specific SEIR model is a mathematical model assuming a deterministic disease process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%