2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11425-010-3120-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the error bounds of nonconforming finite elements

Abstract: We prove that the error estimates of a large class of nonconforming finite elements are dominated by their approximation errors, which means that the well-known Cea's lemma is still valid for these nonconforming finite element methods. Furthermore, we derive the error estimates in both energy and L 2 norms under the regularity assumption u ∈ H 1+s (Ω) with any s > 0. The extensions to other related problems are possible.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(51 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The idea behind these operators is to design for a nonconforming nite element function ℓ some conforming companion +1 ℓ ∈ with certain conservation properties. For = 2, operators of this kind have been constructed in [14] and independently in [41]. The following result extends [14] to any dimension ≥ 2.…”
Section: Nonconforming Finite Element Space and Companion Operatormentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The idea behind these operators is to design for a nonconforming nite element function ℓ some conforming companion +1 ℓ ∈ with certain conservation properties. For = 2, operators of this kind have been constructed in [14] and independently in [41]. The following result extends [14] to any dimension ≥ 2.…”
Section: Nonconforming Finite Element Space and Companion Operatormentioning
confidence: 91%
“…An important methodological tool is the higher-order 2 control for the eigenfunction approximations which is proven by means of conforming companion operators. Operators of this kind were introduced in [14,41] in the twodimensional case and are generalised in this paper to higher space dimensions ≥ 2. The resulting 2 error estimates compare the 2 error directly with the energy error and therefore do not employ any a priori results of the eigenfunction approximation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4.4) is usually referred to as the approximation error and the second term is referred to as the consistency error. To analyze the consistency error, we need to modify the technique from [11,13,14].…”
Section: Lemma 41 For Anymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the second term cannot be coped with by the technique from [11,13,14]. Herein we follow a similar technique from [12].…”
Section: Y LI / Computers and Mathematics With Applications ( ) -mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation