2009 Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering 2009
DOI: 10.1109/ccece.2009.5090228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the energy detection of unknown deterministic signal over Nakagami channelswith selection combining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another common option is the cyclostationary detector, which has a much higher complexity and requires knowledge of the cyclic frequencies [15], which again is a quantity that is not easily available. The major drawback of ED is that it requires knowledge of the noise-power [8,9,16,17,19,22,24]. Lack of this knowledge or noise-power uncertainty [8,9,15,18,19,25,26] causes a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) wall and a high PFA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another common option is the cyclostationary detector, which has a much higher complexity and requires knowledge of the cyclic frequencies [15], which again is a quantity that is not easily available. The major drawback of ED is that it requires knowledge of the noise-power [8,9,16,17,19,22,24]. Lack of this knowledge or noise-power uncertainty [8,9,15,18,19,25,26] causes a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) wall and a high PFA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume g i = g for identical channels. For Nakagami-m fading channels the probability density function (PDF) of g i is defined in [20,24]. We also assume that there is no line of sight present.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on [5], the ROC analysis over Rayleigh, Rician, Nakagami-m, and η-μ channel models is discussed in [6]- [9]. Furthermore, diversity reception techniques such as equal gain combining (EGC), selection combining (SC), maximal ratio combining (MRC), square law combining (SLC), and square law selection (SLS), which are used to boost the performance of the energy detector, are discussed in [7]- [11]. The ROC analysis reveals that MRC improves the performance of the energy detector the most among all the diversity reception techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MGC-SDF is the optimal choice; however, this scheme requires information between the SU and the PU, which is difficult to get in practice. The MGC-SDF is also sensitive to the attack of MUs sending false data to the FC [28][29][30]. The CSS protection scheme, discussed in [31], is used for the detection of the always yes and always no MUs, where outlier detection technique is used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison with [39], this work optimizes the detection, false alarm, and error results when MUs take low and high SNR of the channel in comparison with NSUs. The proposed scheme is tested at different levels of SNR and increasing number of cooperative users with simple soft decision fusion (SDF) and hard decision fusion (HDF) schemes in [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. Simulation results at different levels of cooperative SUs and various SNR levels confirmed that with the use of the one-to-many neighbor distance-and z-score-based GA, the system is able to produce more sophisticated detection results for the HDF schemes in the presence of MUs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%