2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.10.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the effects of the gap on the unsteady pressure characteristics of two-box bridge girders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most noticeable differences can be found for the * flutter derivatives, since the larger the gap distance, the higher the negative value of this flutter derivative. This is in agreement with the findings in [12], and explains the improved aeroelastic performance of twin-box decks since the larger the gap is, the higher the aerodynamic damping related with the velocity of rotation for the aeroelastic moment. In addition, differences can be found for the flutter derivatives * and * , where the longer the gap distance, the lower the absolute value of the flutter derivatives for the same reduced velocity.…”
Section: Flutter Derivativessupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The most noticeable differences can be found for the * flutter derivatives, since the larger the gap distance, the higher the negative value of this flutter derivative. This is in agreement with the findings in [12], and explains the improved aeroelastic performance of twin-box decks since the larger the gap is, the higher the aerodynamic damping related with the velocity of rotation for the aeroelastic moment. In addition, differences can be found for the flutter derivatives * and * , where the longer the gap distance, the lower the absolute value of the flutter derivatives for the same reduced velocity.…”
Section: Flutter Derivativessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The literature on the subject focused on the flutter response, which was much improved compared to mono-box designs, the vortex-induced excitation risk, that is the main drawback of this deck arrangement, as well as Reynolds number effects [2]- [12]. More recently, the effect of the boxes' geometry has also been studied [13], [14], as well as the effect of aerodynamic appendages [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Twin-box girders with a center gap between two girders has been proven to be one of the effective aerodynamic countermeasures for improving the aerodynamic performance of long-span cable-supported bridges, and so its implementation becomes increasingly popular for long-span, or even super long-span bridges [1,2,3], e.g., Xihoumen Bridge with the main span of 1650 m (China) and Gwangyang Bridge with the main span of 1545 m (Korea). Nevertheless, twin-box girders with various Slot Width Ratios (SWRs, for example, the 20% SWR refers to D/Bs= 0.2, where D is slot width and Bs is the width of two decks) may exhibit different flutter performance [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to cost considerations, the ratio of the gap width to the single deck width is normally set to be smaller than 1.0 (Trein et al, 2013). Keeping in mind that flutter stability improves with the gap width increase, it is likely that the vortex shedding mechanism is also affected by the change of the gap width.…”
Section: Re Effects On Vortex Sheddingmentioning
confidence: 99%