2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the dynamics of students' approaches to learning: The effects of the teaching/learning environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
137
0
20

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 208 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
6
137
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous qualitative analysis of our students’ comments revealed that the perceived workload, the insufficiently aligned assessment and the absence of a counterbalanced role of teachers were the factors driving the learners away from the deep learning planned with PBL (unpublished results). In addition, the complexity and time-consuming learning activities required in PBL sessions [48] and the demands of the deep learning approach over the surface approach could induce students to revert over the years to a more expedient, superficial and hence less demanding approach to learning [9,11,12]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A previous qualitative analysis of our students’ comments revealed that the perceived workload, the insufficiently aligned assessment and the absence of a counterbalanced role of teachers were the factors driving the learners away from the deep learning planned with PBL (unpublished results). In addition, the complexity and time-consuming learning activities required in PBL sessions [48] and the demands of the deep learning approach over the surface approach could induce students to revert over the years to a more expedient, superficial and hence less demanding approach to learning [9,11,12]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thereafter, much effort has been given on fostering deep approaches to learning in order to promote deep and meaningful learning in particular through student-centred teaching methods [9]. More recently, approaches to learning were shown not to be a stable psychological trait [9] knowing that students can adopt one approach or the other depending on the educational context in which they are learning [4,10]. However, fostering a deep approach has revealed quite difficult [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former characterizes a passive and limited interaction between the subject and the object of knowledge. The latter represents an active posture of the subject within the learning process, building connections, looking for better comprehension and construction of personal meaning when dealing with knowledge (Biggs, 1987a;Entwistle & Ramsden, 1983;Struyven, Dochy, Janssens, & Gielen, 2006).…”
Section: Second Principle: Metacognition Is Composed By Two Broad Commentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the initial research of Marton (1975) and Marton andSaljö (1976a, 1976b), other researchers begun to study the students' approaches to learning -SAL - (Entwistle, McCune, & Walker, 2001;Entwistle & Ramsden, 1983;Struyven et al, 2006), therefore in the 1990s both the DAP and the SAP were empirically identifi ed in different countries and cultures (Wong, Lin, & Watkins, 1996). Furthermore, many researches showed evidences about the predictive validity of deep approach on academic achievement (Biggs, 1987a;Diseth & Martinsen, 2003;Entwistle & Ramsden, 1983;Kizilgunes, Tekkaya, & Sungur, 2009).…”
Section: Second Principle: Metacognition Is Composed By Two Broad Commentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El Modelo Educativo Universidad de Atacama es por definición un ambiente educativo centrado en el estudiante (Asún, Zúñiga y Ayala, 2013); se requiere por parte del mismo del aprendizaje activo y significativo, a través de una actitud, comportamiento e interpretación activa y profunda de la información de estudio seleccionada (Renkl, 2009). Los modelos centrados en el estudiante declaran la importancia de promover la adopción de estilos de aprendizaje significativo y estudio profundos, con el propósito de lograr congruencia con las demandas que por definición exigen este tipo de ambientes educativos (Struyven et al, 2006); en pos del subsecuente éxito académico esperado.…”
unclassified