2017
DOI: 10.1080/00223131.2017.1299648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the diffusion coefficient calculation in two-step light water reactor core analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data preparation process for the fuel elements is historically based on the exact transport simulation of the fuel assembly with reflective boundary conditions [1]. The main complication of this approach is fact that the fuel assemblies are not in the infinite medium environment during the 3D calculation.…”
Section: Data Preparation Process and Reflector Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The data preparation process for the fuel elements is historically based on the exact transport simulation of the fuel assembly with reflective boundary conditions [1]. The main complication of this approach is fact that the fuel assemblies are not in the infinite medium environment during the 3D calculation.…”
Section: Data Preparation Process and Reflector Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research reactors and NPPs are almost always operated in the critical state, but during the data preparation process, the infinite medium of the the fuel assemblies can be sub-critical or super-critical in case of their enrichment and geometry. Some solution of these issues can be found in the B1 approximation, described bellow or in the article [1]. The comparison of B1, P1 and CASMO methods can be found in the paper [1].…”
Section: Data Preparation Process and Reflector Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Three-step method firstly adopts detailed numerical analysis on fuel cell or lattice scale, the regional homogenization is carried out subsequently and the last step is the diffusion or transport calculation for the whole core. By contrast, pin-by-pin method has two steps (Choi et al, 2017), namely assembly transport calculation and a reactor core calculation. However, three-step method and pin-by-pin method both consider the fuel cell or assembly as a unity, so nuclide reaction inside the fuel area cannot be taken into consideration in detail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While rapidly progressing in the MC methods, deterministic approaches are still useful for design studies for new concepts in advanced reactors from the viewpoint of an equilibrium between calculation precision and computational cost. Following outstanding developments were done: in Ref [12], the GENESIS code was developed implementing the Legendre polynomial expansion of angular flux method; Ref [13] assessed consistent and rigorous precision of various methods for calculating the diffusion coefficients in a two-step reactor core analysis of light water reactors. New resonance self-shielding methods were proposed to treat for radially and azimuthally dependence in general multi-region geometry [14] and for the random medium of the high-temperature reactor lattice cells [15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%