On the determination of the emitter saturation current density from lifetime measurements of silicon devices

Abstract

Contactless photoconductance measurements are commonly used to extract the emitter saturation current density (Joe) for crystalline silicon samples containing an emitter on the surface. We review the physics behind the analysis of Joe and compare the commonly used approximations with more generalised solutions using two‐dimensional device simulations. We quantify errors present in such approximations for different test conditions involving varying illumination conditions and surface properties in samples with the same emitter on both sides. The simulated Joe obtained from the dark hole current from the emitter into the bulk is nearly the same as the simulated Joe determined by photoconductance measurements of the rear diffusion. The simulated Joe at the front emitter is equivalent to that at the rear emitter only when the sample is subject to a nearly constant and flat generation profile. For illumination conditions including visible light, the simulated Joe at the front emitter is smaller than the simulated Joe at the rear emitter. Both Joe at the rear emitter and from the dark hole current in the emitter remain nearly constant over a wide range of base doping densities. The approximations used for the determination of Joe from photoconductance measurements make Joe dependent on the excess minority carrier density. Lifetime measurements demonstrate that, even in high‐quality silicon, Joe should be determined from the analytical solution as a function of excess minority carrier density including Shockley‐Read‐Hall recombination. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Reverse Saturation Current Density Imaging of Highly Doped Regions in Silicon Employing Photoluminescence Measurements

“…For the simulations, we solve the full set of semiconductor equations and use independently measured device properties according to [17]. The excess charge carrier density above the contact area is averaged over the sample thickness at different illumination levels, and the J 0 value of the contacted area is calculated according to (1).…”

Deposition temperature independent excellent passivation of highly boron doped silicon emitters by thermal atomic layer deposited Al2O3

“…As Auger recombination has a large contribution to the resulting emitter saturation current density J 0e , different Auger parameterization models will result in different J 0e values. 20,38 The commonly accepted Auger parameterization model by Kerr and Cuevas 39 was used in this work. Besides that the measured ECV doping profile and Q f of the Al 2 O 3 film were also used in the simulations.…”

Simulation Results: Optimization of Contact Ratio for Interdigitated Back-Contact Solar Cells

“…For the exact comparison with recombination, more experimental results are required, which specifically focus on contact size. However, most of the optimization of contact sizes are done at wafer level, that is, by processing of wafer for sheet resistance measurement [25], lifetime measurement [50], and transfer length measurement [51]. But these measurements do not relate contact sizes with cell parameters.…”