1992
DOI: 10.1016/0021-8502(92)90531-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the determination of electrostatic precipitator efficiency by differential mobility analyzer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most commonly used flue gas cleaner in these circumstances is the electrostatic precipitator (ESP). According to the studies of Ylatalo et al (1992), the total mass collection efficiency with the ESP can be over 99.7%, while the collection efficiency for the above mentioned range can be only 85%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly used flue gas cleaner in these circumstances is the electrostatic precipitator (ESP). According to the studies of Ylatalo et al (1992), the total mass collection efficiency with the ESP can be over 99.7%, while the collection efficiency for the above mentioned range can be only 85%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%