1969
DOI: 10.1590/s0373-55241969000100005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the dentition of the sand shark, Odontaspis taurus, from the vicinity of Cananéia, Brazil

Abstract: Variation in the tooth distribution pattern and number of teeth is described from 528 jaws of the mangona or sand shark, Odontaspis taurus, from the vicinity of Cananéia, Brazil. On the basis of dental characteristics, this series gives no support to the recognition of more than one species of the shallow-water inhabiting sharks known variously over the world as sand sharks, mangonas, sardas, squalos toros, or grey nurse sharks. Counts of the teeth of 12 females and the two embryos contained in each of them sh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, studying elasmobranch dentitions is not an easy task because of various intraspecific variation parameters one must take into consideration. Intraspecific tooth variations in elasmobranchs can occur in number of tooth rows, in number of accessory cusps (e.g., Gudger, 1937;Sadowsky, 1970;Taniuchi, 1970), at different ontogenetic stages (e.g., Reif, 1976;Shimada, 2002b); between sexes that may also differ between different mating seasons (e.g., McCourt and Kerstitch, 1980;Gruber and Compagno, 1981;Kajiura and Tricas, 1996), among different geographic regions (Lucifora et al, 2003), or in abnormal forms (e.g., Gudger, 1937;Raschi et al, 1982;Kaneko and Goto, 2001). The lack of any consideration of such variations would lead to the 'taxonomic instability' of toothbased species common to fossil forms (Shimada and Cicimurri, 2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, studying elasmobranch dentitions is not an easy task because of various intraspecific variation parameters one must take into consideration. Intraspecific tooth variations in elasmobranchs can occur in number of tooth rows, in number of accessory cusps (e.g., Gudger, 1937;Sadowsky, 1970;Taniuchi, 1970), at different ontogenetic stages (e.g., Reif, 1976;Shimada, 2002b); between sexes that may also differ between different mating seasons (e.g., McCourt and Kerstitch, 1980;Gruber and Compagno, 1981;Kajiura and Tricas, 1996), among different geographic regions (Lucifora et al, 2003), or in abnormal forms (e.g., Gudger, 1937;Raschi et al, 1982;Kaneko and Goto, 2001). The lack of any consideration of such variations would lead to the 'taxonomic instability' of toothbased species common to fossil forms (Shimada and Cicimurri, 2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A maioria das espécies habita áreas oceânicas (e.g., Isurus oxyrinchus, I. paucus, Lamna nasus, Pseudocarcharias kamoharai) e são capturadas por meio de barcos espinheleiros que operam nestas áreas. O cação-mangona, Carcharias taurus é o mais costeiro de todos, associado quase exclusivamente à plataforma continental (Sadowsky, 1970;Figueiredo, 1977). Já os cações-raposa, Alopias vulpinus, quando jovens, podem ser encontrados próximos da costa, ao contrário de seu congênere, A. superciliosus, restrito ao ambiente oceânico epi e mesopelágico (Gadig et al, 2001).…”
Section: Ordem Lamniformes (Magona Cações-raposa;unclassified
“…Most previous research on C. taurus in the region has focused on taxonomy (e.g. Lahille, 1928;Sadowsky, 1970) or is limited to miscellaneous observations from comparatively few specimens (Cervigó n and Bastida, 1974;Menni et al, 1986). Until now, the general biology of C. taurus in the region has remained unknown (Menni, 1986b) despite the species being harvested throughout its regional range (Charvet, 1995;Chiaramonte, 1998;Nion, 1999;Lucifora, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%