1982
DOI: 10.1016/0017-9310(82)90111-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the deformation of the rectangular turbulent jet cross-section

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As far as the distance of the line source is concerned, different lengths at the same Reynolds number were found in [3][4]. The deformation of a three-dimensional rectangular jet was investigated in [5] where the line-source of the jet was upstream the slot exit, independently from the Reynolds number.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as the distance of the line source is concerned, different lengths at the same Reynolds number were found in [3][4]. The deformation of a three-dimensional rectangular jet was investigated in [5] where the line-source of the jet was upstream the slot exit, independently from the Reynolds number.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as the distance of the line source is concerned, Bradbury (1965) found a length L S = À3H, while Gutmark and Wygnanski (1976) measured a length L S = À2H at Re H = 30,000. The deformation of a three-dimensional rectangular jet was investigated by Abramovich (1982) who declared that the line-source of the jet was upstream the slot exit at L S = À4.5 H, independently from the Reynolds number.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In perfect axial-symmetry conditions, these two estimates would give exactly the same result, so that deviations must be ascribed to the specific geometry of the nozzle: Experimental uncertainties are calculated based on the standard error on the mean entropy production, i.e. the mean square differences among instantaneous and mean values as expressed in Equation (10). This leads to an error from 2% to 4% depending on the Reynolds number and on the specific jet geometry.…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reason for axis switching seems to be the asymmetric pressure distribution due to non-uniform curvature of the nozzle on different axes [9]. In addition, the different growth rates of shear layers on the short and long sides of the nozzle is another reason leading to a crossover point at which both growth rates become equal and axis switching takes place [10]. Therefore, the combination of non-circular nozzles with sharp-edged orifices could result in mixing enhancement due to the combination of axis-switching and vena-contracta phenomena especially in the jet near field.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%