2001
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.271949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Debt Capacity of Growth Options

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
118
2
7

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(15 reference statements)
21
118
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, growth opportunities should rather be equity-financed. Analogously, the model of Barclay et al [2006] predicts a negative relation between book leverage and growth opportunities. Though, in this last paper, the result is driven by a trade-off between underinvestment costs and cash-flow benefits associated with additional debt financing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Therefore, growth opportunities should rather be equity-financed. Analogously, the model of Barclay et al [2006] predicts a negative relation between book leverage and growth opportunities. Though, in this last paper, the result is driven by a trade-off between underinvestment costs and cash-flow benefits associated with additional debt financing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…For example, Bradley, Jarrell, and Kim (1984) show that industries associated with high growth opportunities tend to have low market leverage. Smith and Watts (1992) and Barclay, Morellec, and Smith (2006) show using Compustat data a negative relation between market leverage and the market-to-book ratio, a commonly used proxy for growth options. Rajan and Zingales (1995) extend this analysis to show that the relation between market leverage and the market-to-book ratio is negative and significant across seven different countries.…”
Section: Empirical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our paper also relates to the literature that examines the relation between growth options and debt financing (see Myers, 1977;Barclay, Morellec, and Smith, 2006). In this literature, the cost of investment is exogenous and firms have a monopoly access to investment projects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In conditions of the Anglo-American model, majority of companies is traded at public capital markets, which means that derivation of market value is done on the basis of product of the stock market value and number of issued stocks. That is also why Barclay, Morellec and Smith [2] in their study based on research of companies at the American capital market claim that there is no reason to use retrospective information when there is perspective information. Due to such arguments, the research uses indicators on the basis of accounting data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%