1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)00252-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the current management of osteosarcoma. A critical evaluation and a proposal for a modified treatment strategy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
95
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
95
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Doxorubicin is one of the most effective drugs in the management of osteosarcoma (Bruland and Pihl, 1997;Ferguson and Goorin, 2001). Although liposomal delivery of doxorubicin improves the tumour uptake compared to free doxorubicin, the drug distribution within the tumour tissue is still heterogeneous (Vaage et al, 1997;Davies et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Doxorubicin is one of the most effective drugs in the management of osteosarcoma (Bruland and Pihl, 1997;Ferguson and Goorin, 2001). Although liposomal delivery of doxorubicin improves the tumour uptake compared to free doxorubicin, the drug distribution within the tumour tissue is still heterogeneous (Vaage et al, 1997;Davies et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most published studies on osteosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma apply patient selection on the basis of age, tumour site, stage or treatment protocol, and are thus not representative of OS and ES in general [13]. In order to address a more general development in the treatment and outcome of high-grade bone sarcomas we therefore present an unselected patient material of OS and ES from a single national reference institution, with analyses of general trends over time across all ages, stages and tumour sites, and with sub analyses where appropriate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding supports the view that no major chemotherapy breakthrough can explain the entire improvement in survival seen over time, and the fraction of patients treated with chemotherapy has remained virtually unchanged (Table II). The international experience is that although major improvements were seen in both OS and ES after the introduction of effective combination chemotherapy in the late 1970s and early 1980s, subsequent further intensification has led to only limited progress [6,13,15]. It should also be noted that there is no evidence in the literature of the natural prognosis of OS and ES having changed over the time period in question.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 OS is characterized by a high propensity for metastasis, mostly to the lungs, with 10-20% having detectable metastases at diagnosis. 5 Only B10% of OS patients achieve long-term disease-free interval. 6 The unifying histologic features of OS are the presence of malignant osteoid produced by neoplastic cells.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%