2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10992-017-9424-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Costs of Nonclassical Logic

Abstract: Solutions to semantic paradoxes often involve restrictions of classical logic for semantic vocabulary. In the paper we investigate the costs of these restrictions in a model case. In particular, we fix two systems of truth capturing the same conception of truth: (a variant) of the system KF of [Feferman 1991] formulated in classical logic, and (a variant of) the system PKF of [Halbach & Horsten 2006], formulated in basic De Morgan logic. The classical system is known to be much stronger than the nonclassical o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The soundness direction of Lemma 1 is straighforward. For a proof of the completeness direction we refer to [2,17].…”
Section: Logic Arithmetic Truthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soundness direction of Lemma 1 is straighforward. For a proof of the completeness direction we refer to [2,17].…”
Section: Logic Arithmetic Truthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By performing the appropriate substitution in (10), we have (12) Pr TS 0 (sub(tr([Av]), num(x)), [Ax]) and therefore, by the properties of substitution, also (13) Pr TS0 (sub(tr([Av]), Av ), num(x)).…”
Section: Prmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, they also deem true more sentences that belong to the intended extension of the truth predicate than the corresponding internal axiomatizations; for some authors (cf. [10,12]), this is considered a clear advantage over internal theories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 They use a proof-theoretical analysis of Cantini to show that the arithmetical theorems provable in PKF are those provable in RT ω ω . But Cantini has another result which states that if KF INT T( A ), then #A ∈ Γ ω ω and if KF T( A ), then #A ∈ Γ 0 .…”
Section: An Upper Bound For Pkf Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 See Reinhardt [16]. 14 For more on this topic see Halbach and Nicolai [12] and Fischer et al [9].…”
Section: An Upper Bound For Pkf Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 99%