1996
DOI: 10.1109/18.508865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the convergence of linear stochastic approximation procedures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assumption G2) is also fairly weak, requiring that the convergence rate of f n g be related to the step size fa n g. In the remarks following the proof of Theorem 2, we indicate how G2) can be relaxed. Note that in the standard case where a n = an 0 , a > 0, 0 < 1, and n = n 0 , > 0, we have c = 0 if < 1, and c = =a if an 10 :…”
Section: G2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Assumption G2) is also fairly weak, requiring that the convergence rate of f n g be related to the step size fa n g. In the remarks following the proof of Theorem 2, we indicate how G2) can be relaxed. Note that in the standard case where a n = an 0 , a > 0, 0 < 1, and n = n 0 , > 0, we have c = 0 if < 1, and c = =a if an 10 :…”
Section: G2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Condition N5) is a weighted averaging condition (see [19] and [21]). For convenience and without loss of generality, we assume in N5) that an < 1 for all n. A special case of this condition (with a n = 1=n) is considered in [5] and [10], where the weighted averaging condition reduces to regular arithmetic averaging (i.e., k = 1 for all k).…”
Section: A Noise Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations