1977
DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1977.01770160058004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Classification of Families

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These subscales were developed based on existing scales and Korean social and cultural context. 34 That is, the Family Environment Scale 35,36 was reviewed for the family dynamic environment scale; the Aggression Questionnaire 37 was reviewed for the antisocial personality scale; the Social Desirability Scale 38 was reviewed for the sociability scale; the Loneliness Scale 39 and Social Support Appraisal Questionnaire 40 were reviewed for the feeling of isolation; and the Intellectual Achievement Responsibility Questionnaire 41 was reviewed for the academic achievement belief scale.…”
Section: Research Variables and Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These subscales were developed based on existing scales and Korean social and cultural context. 34 That is, the Family Environment Scale 35,36 was reviewed for the family dynamic environment scale; the Aggression Questionnaire 37 was reviewed for the antisocial personality scale; the Social Desirability Scale 38 was reviewed for the sociability scale; the Loneliness Scale 39 and Social Support Appraisal Questionnaire 40 were reviewed for the feeling of isolation; and the Intellectual Achievement Responsibility Questionnaire 41 was reviewed for the academic achievement belief scale.…”
Section: Research Variables and Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some kinds of impulsive families (1), families with members who overtly express conflict in the community or at home in a socially undesirable or potentially harmful manner, are also inappropriate for paradoxical intervention. In this case, careful consideration of such techniques as escalation needs to occur in order to prevent potential harm.…”
Section: Contraindicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several kinds of families with which the use of paradoxical techniques as a major therapeutic modality is ill advised. Paradoxical techniques seem least applicable in chaotic families (1), with loose and variable structures. In such families, it is often difficult to gain hold of a concrete issue to work on, and the aim of therapy may be the establishment of some kind of internal cohesion and stability rather than on eliminating particularly troublesome behaviors.…”
Section: Contraindicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paradoxical techniques seem least applicable in chaotic families with loose and variable structures, where the goal is the establishment of some cohesion and stability, rather than the elimination of troublesome behaviour (Fisher, 1977). So too in 'childlike families' in which even the adult members are seeking parenting from the workers-these lack a sufficient unity of purpose for a paradox to be effective and they tend to see interventions as another rejection by a parental figure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%