2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.dam.2016.09.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the bounds for signless Laplacian energy of a graph

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) does not hold. This can be seen from the proof of Lemma 5 (Theorem 3.3 in [22]). In order to make the equality in Lemma 5 hold, on the one hand, graph G must have only one signless Laplacian eigenvalue greater than or equal to average degree 2m n , that is, there should hold q 2 < 2m n for G. On the other hand, for the line graph ℓ(G) of G, its largest adjacency eigenvalue should satisfy µ 1 (ℓ(G)) = 2m(ℓ(G)) n(ℓ(G)) , that is, the line graph ℓ(G) of G is regular, (see page 55, theorem 3.2.1 in [23]).…”
Section: Lemma 5 ([22]mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…(1) does not hold. This can be seen from the proof of Lemma 5 (Theorem 3.3 in [22]). In order to make the equality in Lemma 5 hold, on the one hand, graph G must have only one signless Laplacian eigenvalue greater than or equal to average degree 2m n , that is, there should hold q 2 < 2m n for G. On the other hand, for the line graph ℓ(G) of G, its largest adjacency eigenvalue should satisfy µ 1 (ℓ(G)) = 2m(ℓ(G)) n(ℓ(G)) , that is, the line graph ℓ(G) of G is regular, (see page 55, theorem 3.2.1 in [23]).…”
Section: Lemma 5 ([22]mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…is the first Zagreb index proposed by Gutman and Trinajstić [7]. The other two lower bounds for QE(G) in Corollary 3.2 and Theorem 3.1 in [6] are…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This equation is an extension of the concept of graph energy. Similar to the Laplacian energy, the signless Laplacian energy of a graph G as put forward by Ganie, Hilal and Pirzada [6] is defined as QE(G) = n i=1 |q i − 2m n |. Particularly, if G is a regular graph, then…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the pioneering results of the theory of graph energy are the lower and upper bounds for energy, see [2,5,15,16,18,19,22,26] and the references therein. For more information about energy of graph see [1,9,10,11,12,14,23] and related results see [1,24,25]. A subset S of the vertex set V (G) is said to be a covering set of G if every edge of G is incident to at least one vertex in S. A covering set with minimum cardinality among all covering sets is called the minimum covering set of G and its cardinality, which is denoted by τ = τ (G) is called the vertex covering number of the graph G. If H is a subgraph of the graph G, we denote the graph obtained by removing the edges in H from G by G \ H (that is, only the edges of H are removed from G).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%