1993
DOI: 10.3208/sandf1972.33.3_68
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Bearing Capacity of Surface Footings on Sand Under General Planar Loads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 4(a) sketches the projection of the interaction diagram in the scaled frame (n, t). Although the trends appear to be very similar with a maximal value for the tangential load E 1g-scaled model tests: the formulations derived from References [3,29,30] are almost identical. It should be emphasized that, except some tests performed by Nova and Montrasio [3], they deal with dense sands.…”
Section: Interaction Diagrammentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 4(a) sketches the projection of the interaction diagram in the scaled frame (n, t). Although the trends appear to be very similar with a maximal value for the tangential load E 1g-scaled model tests: the formulations derived from References [3,29,30] are almost identical. It should be emphasized that, except some tests performed by Nova and Montrasio [3], they deal with dense sands.…”
Section: Interaction Diagrammentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The e!ective pressure under the footing is indeed much higher with 1g-scaled models than with full scale (or even centrifuged) footings. Reference [41] con"rm from theoretical results that the introduction of friction angle depending on the e!ective pressure increases the value of the maximal admissible tangential load. Conversely, the lowest value is obtained with a constant friction angle.…”
Section: Interaction Diagrammentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evaluating the load combinations required to induce yielding has been the subject of various studies focused on the bearing capacity of shallow foundations, many of which are summarised in the works of Gottardi and Butterfield (1993), Taiebat and Carter (2000) and Shen et al (2016). For undrained conditions and the case of a horizontal surface foundation resting on horizontal stratum of soil, Gourvenec (2007) proposed the following convenient expression for the yield envelope: …”
Section: Yield Envelopes For Shallow Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of failure envelopes are thoroughly discussed in the literature (Gottardi & Butterfield, 1993;Houlsby & Cassidy, 2002;Gourvenec & Randolph, 2003;Gourvenec & Barnett, 2011). The failure envelope approach is generally less conservative than classical bearing capacity equations, such as Meyerhof (1951), Meyerhof (1953), Brinch Hansen (1961) and Brinch Hansen (1970.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%