2021
DOI: 10.1134/s106378262104014x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Band Gap of AgSbSe2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, experimental optical measurements for absorption edge indicate a much larger E g value of ~0.32 eV. [54] Despite the fact that E g is usually underestimated by density functional theory (DFT) calculations, this gap discrepancy cannot be recovered by the modified Becke Johnson functional (mBJ), or the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) + U methods, or full relativistic calculations. [55] The valence band of AgSbSe 2 is composed of multiple pockets at the Χ-point of the Brillouin zone, while the conduction band minimum is located at L symmetry point, as shown in Figure 1b.…”
Section: Electronic Band Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, experimental optical measurements for absorption edge indicate a much larger E g value of ~0.32 eV. [54] Despite the fact that E g is usually underestimated by density functional theory (DFT) calculations, this gap discrepancy cannot be recovered by the modified Becke Johnson functional (mBJ), or the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) + U methods, or full relativistic calculations. [55] The valence band of AgSbSe 2 is composed of multiple pockets at the Χ-point of the Brillouin zone, while the conduction band minimum is located at L symmetry point, as shown in Figure 1b.…”
Section: Electronic Band Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By use of Arrhenius law, an indirect narrow band gap ( E g) ∼0.03 eV [45] is obtained for AgSbSe 2 . However, experimental optical measurements for absorption edge indicate a much larger E g value of ∼0.32 eV [54] . Despite the fact that E g is usually underestimated by density functional theory (DFT) calculations, this gap discrepancy cannot be recovered by the modified Becke Johnson functional (mBJ), or the Perdew‐Burke‐Ernzerhof (PBE)+U methods, or full relativistic calculations [55] .…”
Section: Electronic Band Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In PbSe‐AgSbSe 2 , similar lattice reduction and band gap enlargement have been observed. [ 33 ] A recent report shows that AgSbSe 2 has a narrow band gap ≈0.35 eV, [ 45 ] and therefore the enlarged band gap in PbSe‐AgSbSe 2 cannot be explained by the Vegard's law. Meanwhile, previous study on SnTe‐AgSbSe 2 did not find the enlargement of band gap.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The determined band gap (E g ) is close to 0 eV, lower than the measured value of 0.32 eV for AgSbSe 2 , but consistent with previous DFT calculations. 67,68 Although E g is underestimated, DFT calculations still provide insights into the evolution of band structures upon Sn doping. In the band structure of AgSbSe 2 , there exist two valence band edges at the W and X points, separated by a small energy offset, which can potentially contribute to carrier transport.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%